Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 11;3(3):e002508.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002508.

Assessing fracture risk in people with MS: a service development study comparing three fracture risk scoring systems

Affiliations

Assessing fracture risk in people with MS: a service development study comparing three fracture risk scoring systems

Ruth Dobson et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Suboptimal bone health is increasingly recognised as an important cause of morbidity. Multiple sclerosis (MS) has been consistently associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture. Various fracture risk screening tools have been developed, two of which are in routine use and a further one is MS-specific. We set out to compare the results obtained by these in the MS clinic population.

Design: This was a service development study. The 10-year risk estimates of any fracture and hip fracture generated by each of the algorithms were compared.

Setting: The MS clinic at the Royal London Hospital.

Participants: 88 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MS.

Outcome measures: Mean 10-year overall fracture risk and hip fracture risk were calculated using each of the three fracture risk calculators. The number of interventions that would be required as a result of using each of these tools was also compared.

Results: Mean 10-year fracture risk was 4.7%, 2.3% and 7.6% using FRAX, QFracture and the MS-specific calculator, respectively (p<0.0001 for difference). The agreement between risk scoring tools was poor at all levels of fracture risk.

Conclusions: The agreement between these three fracture risk scoring tools is poor in the MS population. Further work is required to develop and validate an accurate fracture risk scoring system for use in MS.

Trial registration: This service development study was approved by the Clinical Effectiveness Department at Barts Health NHS Trust (project registration number 156/12).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Combined scatter and box-and-whisker plot demonstrating a 10-year any fracture risk generated by each of the three risk scoring algorithms. The box represents the 25th–75th centile bisected by the median, with the whiskers the range. (B) 10-year any fracture risks generated by each of the three risk scoring algorithms for those patients aged 40 or over only. The box represents the 25th–75th centile bisected by the median, with the whiskers the range.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Bland-Altman plot comparing FRAX and QFracture scores for 10-year risk of any fracture. (B) Bland-Altman plot comparing FRAX and MS-specific scores for 10-year risk of any fracture.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) 10-year hip fracture risks generated by each of the three risk scoring algorithms for all patients. The box represents the 25th–75th centile bisected by the median, with the whiskers the range. (B) 10-year hip fracture risks generated by each of the three risk scoring algorithms for those patients aged 40 or over only. The box represents the 25th–75th centile bisected by the median, with the whiskers the range.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG/Wave25/2 (accessed 1 Nov 2012)
    1. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, et al. FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:385–97 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ 2012;344:e3427. - PubMed
    1. Dobson R, Ramagopalan S, Giovannoni G. Bone health and multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2012;18:1522–8 - PubMed
    1. Dennison EM, Compston JE, Flahive J, et al. Effect of co-morbidities on fracture risk: findings from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). Bone 2012;50:1288–93 - PMC - PubMed