Inferior alveolar nerve canal position among South Indians: A cone beam computed tomographic pilot study
- PMID: 23483095
- PMCID: PMC3591087
- DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.95319
Inferior alveolar nerve canal position among South Indians: A cone beam computed tomographic pilot study
Abstract
Purpose: To document a clinically relevant position of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) in complete dentate south Indian patients in the age group of 20-29 years using cone beam computerized tomograms.
Materials and methods: The investigators used a cross-sectional study design and a study sample of subjects who had a radiographically identifiable IAN canal with complete set of 28 permanent teeth excluding 3(rd) molars. Predictor variables were age, tooth position, and side. Outcome variables were the linear distances between the buccal and lingual aspect of the IAN canal, buccal and lingual cortical thickness, IAN canal diameter, and the superior aspect of the IAN canal from the periapex of first and second mandibular molar. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U test were performed. P value of ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant.
Results: The study sample was composed of 10 male and 10 female patients with a mean age of 24.2 ± 3.00 years. On average, the lingual cortical thickness was 1.68 mm at 1(st) molar and 1.44 at 2(nd) molar level. Gender and side influenced the outcome with varying statistical significance.
Conclusions: The range of linear dimension of mandibular canal, cortical bone thickness, and distance between tooth apex and IAN canal have been presented for the South Indian population in the age group of 20-29 years. The implications of the findings will influence on the course of surgery. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate the findings of this study.
Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography; inferior alveolar nerve canal; mandible.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Levine MH, Goddard AL, Dodson TB. Inferior alveolar nerve canal position: A clinical and radiographic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:470–4. - PubMed
-
- Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Mall TJ, Mulder J, Rangel FA, Borstlap WA, et al. Reproducibility of 3 different tracing methods based on cone beam computed tomography in determining the anatomical position of the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:811–7. - PubMed
-
- Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K. Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:1234–9. - PubMed
-
- Peter I, Alkurt MT, Michioglu T. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in Dental implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:463–70. - PubMed
-
- Angelopoulos C, Thomas S, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2130–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
