Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Apr;18(2):145-60.
doi: 10.1007/BF01063557.

Application of NONMEM to routine bioavailability data

Affiliations

Application of NONMEM to routine bioavailability data

D A Graves et al. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1990 Apr.

Abstract

Although NONMEM has been proposed as a modeling tool for sparse data sets, little work has described its application to pharmacokinetic data which is also amenable to typical evaluations. An analysis was performed with NONMEM using plasma concentration data obtained during the development of liquid and capsule extended-release (ER) pseudoephedrine products. A total of four studies (single dose and steady-state studies for both the liquid and capsule formulations) were evaluated, each with an immediate-release (IR) control, and consisting of 18 to 20 subjects. NONMEM analyses provided additional information which could not be obtained through traditional means. Specifically, NONMEM provided not only estimates of residual error from single dose and steady-state studies but also a stochastic measure of bioinequivalence and dose-dumping. It permitted hypothesis testing in the same process as pharmacokinetic parameter estimation, such as contrasting absorption rates from capsule and suspension ER products. A less biased estimate of absorption rate was obtainable for ER formulations by utilizing IR runs. Finally, these NONMEM runs confirmed that, even when data are plentiful and amenable to two-stage analyses, NONMEM provides estimates that may in fact be more meaningful and less susceptible to assay or residual variability. Fundamental differences between population and two-stage approaches are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Pharm. 1985 Mar-Apr;4(2):199-203 - PubMed
    1. Drug Metab Rev. 1984;15(1-2):153-71 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1989 Oct;17(5):571-92 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1983 Jun;11(3):303-19 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1981 Oct;9(5):635-51 - PubMed