Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;95(2):113-7.
doi: 10.1308/003588413X13511609957137.

Open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip: failures of screening or failures of treatment?

A P Sanghrajka  1 , C F Murnaghan, A Shekkeris, D M Eastwood
Affiliations

Open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip: failures of screening or failures of treatment?

A P Sanghrajka et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to define the clinical indications and demographic characteristics of patients under-going open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and determine the proportion due to preventable failures of contemporary clinical screening and early management.

Methods: Case notes were reviewed of consecutive primary open reductions performed for non-teratologic hip dislocation at the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children over a five-year period. Forty-eight patients (64 hips) were suitable for inclusion. A telephone survey confirmed selective hip ultrasonography screening protocols were employed in all maternity hospitals in our referral base.

Results: There were no cases of open reduction for unilateral DDH following Pavlik treatment commenced by six weeks of age, highlighting the importance of early detection and treatment. Eleven cases (23%) may have been avoided by appropriate implementation of existing selective ultrasonography screening protocols. Thirty-four cases (71%) presented after four months of age, suggesting open reduction is associated with late diagnosis rather than failure of primary management. None of these patients had neonatal hip ultrasonography and only 12% (4 patients) had a risk factor that should have triggered a scan.

Conclusions: Compared with published results, the contemporary screening practices in our referral base are failing to eliminate late presenting DDH and the need for open surgical reduction. Changes in strategy and implementation are required to significantly improve screening efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The prevalence of specific risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the two groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kocher MS. Ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: an epidemiologic analysis (Part I). Am J Orthop 2000; 29: 929–933 - PubMed
    1. Pavlik A. The functional method of treatment using a harness with stirrups as the primary method of conservative therapy for infants with congenital dislocation of the hip. 1957. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 281: 4–10 - PubMed
    1. Cashman JP, Round J, Taylor G, Clarke NM. The natural history of developmental dysplasia of the hip after early supervised treatment in the Pavlik harness. A prospective, longitudinal follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 418–425 - PubMed
    1. von Rosen S. Further experience with congenital dislocation of the hip in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968; 50: 538–541 - PubMed
    1. Pospischill R, Weninger J, Ganger Ret al Does open reduction of the developmental dislocated hip increase the risk of osteonecrosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 250–260 - PMC - PubMed