Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 15;62(10):177-82.

Mobile device use while driving--United States and seven European countries, 2011

Collaborators

Mobile device use while driving--United States and seven European countries, 2011

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. .

Abstract

Road traffic crashes are a global public health problem, contributing to an estimated 1.3 million deaths annually. Known risk factors for road traffic crashes and related injuries and deaths include speed, alcohol, nonuse of restraints, and nonuse of helmets. More recently, driver distraction has become an emerging concern. To assess the prevalence of mobile device use while driving in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States, CDC analyzed data from the 2011 EuroPNStyles and HealthStyles surveys. Prevalence estimates for self-reported talking on a cell phone while driving and reading or sending text or e-mail messages while driving were calculated. This report describes the results of that analysis, which indicated that, among drivers ages 18-64 years, the prevalence of talking on a cell phone while driving at least once in the past 30 days ranged from 21% in the UK to 69% in the United States, and the prevalence of drivers who had read or sent text or e-mail messages while driving at least once in the past 30 days ranged from 15% in Spain to 31% in Portugal and the United States. Lessons learned from successful road safety efforts aimed at reducing other risky driving behaviors, such as seat belt nonuse and alcohol-impaired driving, could be helpful to the United States and other countries in addressing this issue. Strategies such as legislation combined with high-visibility enforcement and public education campaigns deserve further research to determine their effectiveness in reducing mobile device use while driving. Additionally, the role of emerging vehicle and mobile communication technologies in reducing distracted driving-related crashes should be explored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Weighted percentage of adults aged 18–64 years who reported that they had talked on their cell phone while driving regularly or fairly often, at least once, or never in the past 30 days,* by country — HealthStyles and EuroPNStyles, 2011 *Respondents were asked, “In the past 30 days, how often have you talked on your cell phone while you were driving?” Response choices were “never,” “just once,” “rarely,” “fairly often,” and “regularly.” Percentages of those who engaged “at least once” were defined as those who responded “just once,” “rarely,” “fairly often,” or “regularly.” Percentages of those who responded “regularly” or “fairly often” are shown as a subset of “at least once.”
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Weighted percentage of adults aged 18–64 years who reported that they had read or sent text or e-mail messages while driving regularly or fairly often, at least once, or never in the past 30 days,* by country, HealthStyles and EuroPNStyles, 2011 * Respondents were asked, “In the past 30 days, how often have you read or sent a text message or e-mail while you were driving?” Response choices were “never,” “just once,” “rarely,” “fairly often,” and “regularly.” Percentages of those who engaged “at least once” were defined as those who responded “just once,” “rarely,” “fairly often,” or “regularly.” Percentages of those who responded “regularly” or “fairly often” are shown as a subset of “at least once.”
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Weighted percentage of adults aged 18–64 years who reported that they had talked on their cell phone while driving at least once and read or sent text or e-mail messages while driving at least once in the past 30 days,* by sex and age group — United States, HealthStyles, 2011 * Respondents were asked, “In the past 30 days, how often have you talked on your cell phone while you were driving?” and “In the past 30 days, how often have you read or sent a text message or e-mail while you were driving?” Response choices were “never,” “just once,” “rarely,” “fairly often,” and “regularly.” Percentages of those who engaged “at least once” were defined as those who responded “just once,” “rarely,” “fairly often,” or “regularly.”

References

    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Mobile phone use: a growing problem of driver distraction. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011. Available at http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/....
    1. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Community Preventive Services. Atlanta, GA: Community Preventive Services Task Force; 2012. Motor vehicle-related injury prevention. Available at http://www.thecommunityguide.org/mvoi/index.html.
    1. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. 2010 traffic safety culture index. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2010. Available at https://www.aaafoundation.org/2010-traffic-safety-culture-index.
    1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. National phone survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2011. Available at www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/nti/pdf/811555.pdf.