Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;42(2):227-234.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.860.

Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction: The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors

Affiliations

Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction: The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors

Kathleen C McCulloch et al. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

The cohesiveness of a society depends, in part, on how its individual members manage their daily activities with respect to the goals of that society. Hence, there should be a degree of social agreement on what constitutes action and what constitutes inaction. The present research investigated the structure of action and inaction definitions, the evaluation of action versus inaction, and individual differences in these evaluations. Action-inaction ratings of behaviors and states showed more social agreement at the ends of the inaction-action continuum than at the middle, suggesting a socially shared construal of this definition. Action-inaction ratings were also shown to correlate with the valence of the rated behaviors, such that the more active the behavior the more positive its valence. Lastly, individual differences in locomotion, need for closure, and Christian religious beliefs correlated positively with a preference for action.

Keywords: action control; agency; inaction; self-regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean Action-Definition Ratings Study 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean Valence Ratings Study 1
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spread and Variability of the Action-Definition Ratings Study 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albarracin D, Hepler J, Tannenbaum M. General action and inaction goals: Their behavioral, cognitive, and affective origins and influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011;20:119–123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albarracin D, Handley IM, Noguchi K, McCulloch KC, Li H, Leeper J, Brown RD, Earl A, Hart WP. Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;95:510–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison ST, Messick DM. The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1988;14:231–241. - PubMed
    1. Aronson E, Mills J. The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1959;59:177–181. - PubMed
    1. Bargh JA, Gollwitzer PM, Lee-Chai A, Barndollar K, Trotschel R. The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;81:1014–1027. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources