Current status of the use of antiadhesive agents for gastric cancer surgery: a questionnaire survey in South Korea
- PMID: 23487148
- PMCID: PMC3594643
- DOI: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.3.160
Current status of the use of antiadhesive agents for gastric cancer surgery: a questionnaire survey in South Korea
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the current status of the use of antiadhesive agents (AAdAs) via a questionnaire and to discuss the availability of AAdAs.
Methods: The survey was sent to a list of members that was approved by the Korean Gastric Association. The survey included questions on AAdA use by surgeons, the type of AAdAs used, and the reasons for not using AAdAs. Surgeons were also asked to describe complications related to AAdAs, and the reliability of its use.
Results: The response rate was 21%. The rates of frequent use stratified by procedure were 26.9% (14/52) for open gastrectomy, 5.9% (3/51) for laparoscopic gastrectomy, and 31.5% (17/54) for surgery for postoperative bowel obstruction (P < 0.01). After including data from the occasional use group, the corresponding values were 51.9% (27/52), 19.6% (10/51), and 70.4% (38/54), respectively (P < 0.01). Sefrafilm and Guardix were most commonly used for open procedures. Guardix and Interceed were most commonly used for laparoscopic surgery. The primary reasons for nonuse of AAdAs were ineffectiveness and high cost. Ten percent (4/40) of surgeons observed complications associated with AAdAs. A minority (17.3%, 9/52) had positive attitudes toward AAdAs. The majority of respondents expressed neutral (73.1%, 38/52) or negative (9.6%, 5/52) attitudes toward AAdAs.
Conclusion: The low use rates of AAdAs in gastric cancer surgery may be attributable to perceptions that AAdAs are ineffective, unreliable, and costly. We anticipate the emergence of promising antiadhesive strategies that reach far beyond the limitations of current products.
Keywords: Adhesion barriers; Peritoneal adhesions; Postoperative complication; Questionnaires; Stomach neoplasms.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Adhesion awareness: a national survey of surgeons.World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2805-12. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0778-8. World J Surg. 2010. PMID: 20814678 Free PMC article.
-
Worldwide practice in gastric cancer surgery.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 21;22(15):4041-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.4041. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27099448 Free PMC article.
-
Standard of practice on laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in Korea and Japan: experts' survey.Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012 Feb;5(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00111.x. Epub 2011 Nov 24. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012. PMID: 22776335
-
[Clinical trials of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in South Korea: review and prospect].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):154-159. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29492913 Review. Chinese.
-
How much progress has been made in minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Korea?: a viewpoint from Korean prospective clinical trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(28):e233. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000233. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014. PMID: 25526443 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of a Temperature-Sensitive, Anti-Adhesive Agent on the Reduction of Adhesion in a Rabbit Laminectomy Model.J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 May;59(3):250-8. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.250. Epub 2016 May 10. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016. PMID: 27226857 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between the mesenteric fixation method (MEFIX) and conventional methods at preventing the occurrence of Petersen's hernia: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07841-9. Trials. 2024. PMID: 38167216 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of polylactic film (Surgi-Wrap) on preventing postoperative ileus after major hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2016 Nov;20(4):191-196. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2016.20.4.191. Epub 2016 Nov 30. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2016. PMID: 28261699 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:567–576. - PubMed
-
- Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young RL. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management. Dig Surg. 2001;18:260–273. - PubMed
-
- Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1476–1480. - PubMed
-
- Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:1–9. - PubMed
-
- Wilson MS. Practicalities and costs of adhesions. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(Suppl 2):60–65. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources