Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Feb;12(1):106-10.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.12060. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

Comparison of the effects of topical fusidic acid and rifamycin on wound healing in rats

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the effects of topical fusidic acid and rifamycin on wound healing in rats

Mehmet S Gurel et al. Int Wound J. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Wound healing is an active and dynamic process that begins from the moment of injury. Any delay in the initiation of the response to injury can prolong the healing process. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of topically applied fusidic acid and rifamycin on wound healing in a full-thickness wound model. Ten female Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 4 months and weighing 200-250 g, were used. Four rifamycin (R), four fusidic acid (F) and four control (K) areas were generated on their backs by using a 5-mm punch biopsy pen. On the 4th, 7th, 14th and 21st days, biopsies were taken from each wound area of all the rats. Fusidic acid group demonstrated a statistically significant increase of collagen and intensity of fibroblast proliferation on the 21st day of wound healing, whereas in the rifamycin group, healing time was, as expected, similar to physiological wound-healing phases. Despite the limited number of subjects, topical fusidic acid was found to delay wound healing by prolonging fibroblast proliferation.

Keywords: Rifamycin; Topical fusidic acid; Wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preparation of the subjects before the procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photographs of the subjects after forming full‐thickness defect and following wound care.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the neutrophil infiltration in R, F and K groups on days 4, 7, 14 and 21.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of the vascular proliferation in R, F and K groups on days 4, 7, 14 and 21.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of the epithelial proliferation in R, F and K groups on days 4, 7, 14 and 21.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of the fibroblast intensity in R, F and K groups on days 4, 7, 14 and 21.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Del Rosso JQ. Wound care in the dermatology office: where are we in 2011? J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Li W, Dasgeb B, Phillips T, Li Y, Chen M, Garner W, Woodley DT. Wound‐healing perspectives. Dermatol Clin 2005;23:181–92. - PubMed
    1. Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 1999;341:738–46. - PubMed
    1. Carter EL. Antibiotics in cutaneous medicine: an update. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2003;22:196–211. - PubMed
    1. Benfer J, Struck H. The effect of rifamycin SV on the wound‐healing process. Arzneimittelforschung 1976;26:1361–4. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources