Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography
- PMID: 23489528
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.007
Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to define the clinical importance of an integrated classification of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) phenotypes and aortopathy using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
Background: An association between BAV phenotypes and the pattern of valvular dysfunction or bicuspid aortopathy has yet to be definitely established.
Methods: The study cohort included 167 subjects (116 men, age 54.6 ± 14.4 years) who underwent both MDCT and transthoracic echocardiography from 2003 to 2010. Two BAV phenotypes-fusion of the right and left coronary cusps (BAV-AP) and fusion of the right or left coronary cusp and noncoronary cusp (BAV-RL)-were identified. Forty-five patients showed normal aortic dimensions and were classified as type 0. In the remaining patients, hierarchic cluster analysis showed 3 different types of bicuspid aortopathy according to the pattern of aortic dilation: type 1 (aortic enlargement confined to the sinus of Valsalva [n = 34]), type 2 (aortic enlargement involving the tubular portion of the ascending aorta [n = 49]), and type 3 (aortic enlargement extending to the transverse aortic arch [n = 39]).
Results: The prevalence of BAV-AP and BAV-RL was 55.7% and 44.3%, respectively. Comparing BAV-AP and BAV-RL, no differences in age or in the prevalence of male sex were determined. However, significant differences in the valvular dysfunction pattern were noted, with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis predominating in patients with BAV-RL (66.2% vs. 46.2% in BAV-AP; p = 0.01), and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation in BAV-AP (32.3% vs. 6.8% in BAV-RL; p < 0.0001). A normal aorta was the most common phenotype in BAV-AP patients (33.3% vs. 18.9% in BAV-RL; p = 0.037), and type 3 aortopathy was the most common phenotype in BAV-RL patients (40.5% vs. 9.7% in BAV-AP; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy differed significantly between the 2 BAV phenotypes, suggesting the possibility of etiologically different entities.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Bicuspid aortic valve and aortopathy: see the first, then look at the second.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;6(2):162-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.01.001. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23489529 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and aortopathy: nomenclature and role of aortic hemodynamics.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Aug;6(8):921-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.05.011. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23948380 No abstract available.
-
Bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and aortopathy: nomenclature and role of aortic hemodynamics.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Aug;6(8):921. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.03.006. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23948381 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
