Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Aug;36(8):2211-6.
doi: 10.2337/dc12-2510. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with diabetes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with diabetes

Dimitrios Alexopoulos et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: It has been postulated that prasugrel might be the preferred treatment option in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to compare the pharmacodynamic action of ticagrelor versus prasugrel.

Research design and methods: In a prospective, single-center, single-blind, crossover study, 30 consecutive ACS patients with DM who had been pretreated with clopidogrel were randomized to either 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily or 10 mg prasugrel once daily with a 15-day treatment period. Platelet reactivity (PR) was assessed with the VerifyNow P2Y12 function assay, measured in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU).

Results: PR was significantly lower after ticagrelor (45.2 PRU [95% CI 27.4-63.1]) compared with prasugrel (80.8 PRU [63.0-98.7]), with a least squares mean difference of -35.6 PRU (-55.2 to -15.9, P = 0.001). High PR rate was 0% for ticagrelor and 3.3% for prasugrel (P = 1.0).

Conclusions: In DM patients with ACS who had been pretreated with clopidogrel and who undergo PCI, ticagrelor achieves a significantly higher platelet inhibition than prasugrel. Both antiplatelet agents effectively treat high PR. The relevance of these findings to the clinical efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in DM patients needs further elucidation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01642940.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PR (in PRU) by treatment sequence, LS estimates, and 95% CIs are presented. (A high-quality color representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Individual PR values according to treatment. Combined data for the precrossover and postcrossover periods are depicted. Lines represent medians, and error bars represent interquartile range. (A high-quality color representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)

References

    1. Roffi M, Topol EJ. Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2004;25:190–198 - PubMed
    1. Stuckey TD, Stone GW, Cox DA, et al. CADILLAC investigators Impact of stenting and abciximab in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (the CADILLAC trial). Am J Cardiol 2005;95:1–7 - PubMed
    1. James S, Angiolillo DJ, Cornel JH, et al. PLATO Study Group Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes: a substudy from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur Heart J 2010;31:3006–3016 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, et al. Platelet function profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease on combined aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. Diabetes 2005;54:2430–2435 - PubMed
    1. Ferroni P, Basili S, Falco A, Davì G. Platelet activation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2:1282–1291 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data