Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 1;3(3):3-11.
doi: 10.1080/21507716.2012.662575. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

Informed Consent in Genome-Scale Research: What Do Prospective Participants Think?

Susan Brown Trinidad  1 , Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke
Affiliations

Informed Consent in Genome-Scale Research: What Do Prospective Participants Think?

Susan Brown Trinidad et al. AJOB Prim Res. .

Abstract

Background: To promote effective genome-scale research, genomic and clinical data for large population samples must be collected, stored, and shared.

Methods: We conducted focus groups with 45 members of a Seattle-based integrated healthcare delivery system to learn about their views and expectations for informed consent in genome-scale studies.

Results: Participants viewed information about study purpose, aims, and how and by whom study data could be used to be at least as important as information about risks and possible harms. They generally supported a tiered consent approach for specific issues, including research purpose, data sharing, and access to individual research results. Participants expressed a continuum of opinions with respect to the acceptability of broad consent, ranging from completely acceptable to completely unacceptable. Older participants were more likely to view the consent process in relational - rather than contractual - terms, compared with younger participants. The majority of participants endorsed seeking study subjects' permission regarding material changes in study purpose and data sharing.

Conclusions: Although this study sample was limited in terms of racial and socioeconomic diversity, our results suggest a strong positive interest in genomic research on the part of at least some prospective participants and indicate a need for increased public engagement, as well as strategies for ongoing communication with study participants.

Keywords: Informed consent; biobank; genomic research; participant views; research ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Warm-up
Figure 2
Figure 2
Setting the Stage – Intro to GWAS
Figure 3
Figure 3
Topic 2 – How Participants’ Information may be Used*
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beskow LM, Friedman JY, Hardy NC, Lin L, Weinfurt KP. Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2010;12(9):567–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edwards KL, Lemke AA, Trinidad SB, Lewis SM, Starks H, Quinn Griffin MT, Wiesner GL. Attitudes toward genetic research review: Results from a survey of human genetics researchers. Public Health Genomics 2011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greely HT. The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annual review of genomics and human genetics. 2007;8:343–64. - PubMed
    1. Holland Jonna, Baker Stacey Menzel. Customer participation in creating site brandloyalty. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2001;15(4):34–45.
    1. Lemke AA, Trinidad SB, Edwards KL, Starks H, Wiesner GL. Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a national survey of professionals involved in human subjects protection. Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE. 2010;5(1):83–91. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources