Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 9:13:87.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-87.

Viewing health expenditures, payment and coping mechanisms with an equity lens in Nigeria

Affiliations

Viewing health expenditures, payment and coping mechanisms with an equity lens in Nigeria

Oforbuike Ewelukwa et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: This paper examines socio-economic and geographic differences in payment and payment coping mechanisms for health services in southeast Nigeria. It shows the extent to which the poor and rural dwellers disproportionally bear the burden of health care costs and offers policy recommendations for improvements.

Methods: Questionnaires were used to collect data from 3071 randomly selected households in six communities in southeast Nigeria using a four week recall. The sample was divided into quintiles (Q1-Q5) using a socio-economic status (SES) index as well as into geographic groups (rural, peri-urban and urban). Tabulations and logistic regression were used to determine the relationships between payment and payment coping mechanisms and key independent variables. Q1/Q5 and rural/urban ratios were the measures of equity.

Results: Most of the respondents used out-of-pocket spending (OOPS) and own money to pay for healthcare. There was statistically significant geographic differences in the use of own money to pay for health services indicating more use among rural dwellers. Logistic regression showed statistically significant geographic differences in the use of both OOPS and own money when controlling for the effects of potential cofounders.

Conclusions: This study shows statistically significant geographic differences in the use of OOPS and own money to pay for health services. Though the SES differences were not statistically significant, they showed high equity ratios indicating more use among poor and rural dwellers. The high expenditure incurred on drugs alone highlights the need for expediting pro-poor interventions like exemptions and waivers aimed at improving access to health care for the vulnerable poor and rural dwellers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wagstaff A. Poverty and health sector inequalities. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):97–105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu K. et al.Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):111–117. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13861-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. EQUINET: HNC, UCT HEU. Progress in fair financing for health in east and southern africa policy brief 30, EQUINET, harare. Cited 2012 14/12. 2012. Available from: http://www.equinetafrica.org.
    1. WHO. World health organization, data and statistics 2012. 2012. cited 2012 14/12]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.75.
    1. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G, Evans T. Equity and health sector reforms: can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap? Lancet. 2001;358(9284):833–836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05975-X. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources