Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Mar 13:8:30.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-30.

Diabetes in rural towns: effectiveness of continuing education and feedback for healthcare providers in altering diabetes outcomes at a population level: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Christine L Paul  1 , Leon Piterman, Jonathan Shaw, Catherine Kirby, Robert W Sanson-Fisher, Mariko L Carey, Jennifer Robinson, Patrick McElduff, Isaraporn Thepwongsa
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Diabetes in rural towns: effectiveness of continuing education and feedback for healthcare providers in altering diabetes outcomes at a population level: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Christine L Paul et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes is one of the fastest growing chronic diseases internationally. The health complications associated with type 2 diabetes can be prevented, delayed, or improved via early diagnosis and effective management. This research aims to examine the impact of a primarily web-based educational intervention on the diabetes care provided by general practitioners (GPs) in rural areas, and subsequent patient outcomes. A population-level approach to outcome assessment is used, via whole-town de-identified pathology records.

Methods/design: The study uses a cluster randomised controlled trial with rural communities as the unit of analysis. Towns from four Australian states were selected and matched on factors including rurality, population size, proportion of the population who were Indigenous Australians, and socio-economic status. Eleven pairs of towns from two states were suitable for the trial, and one town from each pair was randomised to the experimental group. GPs in the towns allocated to the experimental group are offered an intervention package comprising education on best practice diabetes care via an on-line active learning module, a moderated discussion forum, access to targeted and specialist advice through an on-line request form, and town-based performance feedback on diabetes monitoring and outcomes. The package is offered via repeated direct mail.

Discussion: The benefits of the outcomes of the trial are described along with the challenges and limitations associated with the methodology.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12611000553976.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. International Diabetes Atlas. International Diabetes Federation. 5. 2012. http://www.idf.org. - PubMed
    1. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Diabetes series no 8 Cat no CVC 40. Canberra: AIHW; 2008. Diabetes: Australian Facts.
    1. Barr EL, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, Jolley D, Magliano DJ, Dunstan DW, Cameron AJ, Dwyer T, Taylor HR, Tonkin AM. Risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) Circulation. 2007;116:151–157. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685628. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parsons J, Wilson D, Scardigno A. The impact of diabetes in South Australia 2000: the summary. Adelaide: South Australian Department of Human Services; 2000.

Publication types

MeSH terms