Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 16:6:73.
doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-73.

A shift from indoor residual spraying (IRS) with bendiocarb to long-lasting insecticidal (mosquito) nets (LLINs) associated with changes in malaria transmission indicators in pyrethroid resistance areas in Benin

A shift from indoor residual spraying (IRS) with bendiocarb to long-lasting insecticidal (mosquito) nets (LLINs) associated with changes in malaria transmission indicators in pyrethroid resistance areas in Benin

Razaki A Ossè et al. Parasit Vectors. .

Abstract

Background: Indoor residual spraying (IRS) was implemented in the department of Ouémé-Plateau, southern Benin, in 2008 and withdrawn in 2011, when long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed to the communities that were previously targeted by IRS. Did the LLIN strategy provide a better level of protection against malaria transmission than IRS?

Methods: Entomological surveillance was carried out to assess indicators of transmission risk during the last year of IRS and the first year after the LLIN intervention was put in place (2010-2011). Mosquito biting density was sampled by human landing collection (HLC). Females of Anopheles gambiae s.l. were dissected to estimate the parity rates and the blood meal index. A subsample of the An. gambiae s.l. collection was tested for presence of Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. In addition, window exit traps and pyrethrum spray catches were performed to assess exophagic behavior of Anopheles vectors.

Results: There were significant increases in all the indicators following withdrawal of IRS. Vector biting density (p<0.001) and longevity (OR=3.81[3.01-4.82] 95% CI; p<0.001) of the An. gambiae s.l. increased significantly; so too did the blood meal index (OR=1.48 [1.1-1.99] 95% CI; p<0.001). Entomological inoculation rate, after IRS withdrawal at one surveillance site, Adjohoun, rose two fold (9.0 infected bites/person/9 months (Apr-Dec 2011) versus 3.66 infective bites/person during the 9 months preceding IRS (Apr-Dec 2010). A second site, Missérété, experienced a six-fold increase after IRS cessation (15.1 infective bites/person/9 months versus 2.41 during IRS). Exophily after IRS cessation decreased significantly in all areas (p<0.001) suggesting that mosquitoes were more likely to rest in houses with LLINs, than in houses subjected to IRS.

Conclusion: LLINs did not impact on indicators of transmission to the same levels as did IRS after IRS withdrawal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of the study area showing localities chosen in central and peripheral areas.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Aggressive variation of An. gambiae s.l density depending on rainfall in Adjohoun (A), Sèmè (B) and Dangbo (C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exophily rate of An. gambiae observed during IRS campaign and after IRS withdrawal in central area (A) and peripheral area (B) in the various districts. Exophily rate carrying the same letter per district was not significantly different (p> 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Parity rate of Anopheles gambiae observed during the implementation of IRS and after IRS withdrawal. The rate carrying the same letter per district was not significantly different (p> 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Blood feeding rate of Anopheles gambiae observed during IRS implementation and after IRS withdrawal. The rate carrying the same letter per district was not significantly different (p> 0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Blood feeding rate of Culicidae observed during IRS implementation and after IRS withdrawal. The rate carrying the same letter per district was not significantly different (p> 0.05).

References

    1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011. http://www.who.int/malaria/world_malaria_report_2011/en/ (accessed 21. 05. 2012)
    1. Kelly-Hope L, Ranson H, Hemingway J. Lessons from the past: managing insecticide resistance in malaria control and eradication programmes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:387–389. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70045-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Protopopoff N, Van Herp M, Maes P, Reid T, Baza D, D’Alessandro U, Van Bortel W, Coosemans M. Vector control in a malaria epidemic occurring within a complex emergency situation in Burundi: a case study. Malar J. 2007;6:93. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-93. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aregawi MW, Ali AS, Al-mafazy AW, Molteni F, Katikiti S, Warsame M, Njau RJA, Komatsu R, Korenromp E, Hosseini M, Low-Beer D, Bjorkman A, D’Alessandro U, Coosemans M, Otten M. Reductions in malaria and anaemia case and death burden at hospitals following scale-up of malaria control in Zanzibar, 1999–2008. Malar J. 2011;10:46. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-46. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Meara WP, Mangeni JN, Steketee R, Greenwood B. Changes in the burden of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:545–555. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70096-7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types