Patterns of preoperative consultation and surgical specialty in an integrated healthcare system
- PMID: 23503373
- PMCID: PMC4162741
- DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828ea68a
Patterns of preoperative consultation and surgical specialty in an integrated healthcare system
Abstract
Background: Many patients scheduled for elective surgery are referred for a preoperative medical consultation. Only limited data are available on factors associated with preoperative consultations. The authors hypothesized that surgical specialty contributes to variation in referrals for preoperative consultations.
Methods: This is a cohort study using data from Group Health Cooperative, an integrated healthcare system. The authors included 13,673 patients undergoing a variety of common procedures-primarily low-risk surgeries-representing six surgical specialties, in 2005-2006. The authors identified consultations by family physicians, general internists, pulmonologists, or cardiologists in the 42 days preceding surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between surgical specialty and consultation, adjusting for potential confounders including the revised cardiac risk index, age, gender, Deyo comorbidity index, number of prescription medications, and 11 medication classes.
Results: The authors found that 3,063 (22%) of all patients had preoperative consultations, with significant variation by surgical specialty. Patients having ophthalmologic, orthopedic, or urologic surgery were more likely to have consultations compared with those having general surgery-adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of 3.8 (3.3-4.2), 1.5 (1.3-1.7), and 2.3 (1.8-2.8), respectively. Preoperative consultations were more common in patients with lower revised cardiac risk scores.
Conclusion: There is substantial practice variation among surgical specialties with regard to the use of preoperative consultations in this integrated healthcare system. Given the large number of consultations provided for patients with low cardiac risk and for patients presenting for low-risk surgeries, their indications, the financial burden, and cost-effectiveness of consultations deserve further study.
Figures
Comment in
-
The evolution of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine.Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1005-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828ea5cb. Anesthesiology. 2013. PMID: 23508221 No abstract available.
References
-
- Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA. 2012;307:1513–6. - PubMed
-
- Bloche MG. Beyond the “R word”? Medicine’s new frugality. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1951–3. - PubMed
-
- Kuehn BM. Movement to promote good stewardship of medical resources gains momentum. JAMA. 2012;307:895–902-3. - PubMed
-
- Qaseem A, Alguire P, Dallas P, Feinberg LE, Fitzgerald FT, Horwitch C, Humphrey L, LeBlond R, Moyer D, Wiese JG, Weinberger S. Appropriate use of screening and diagnostic tests to foster high-value, cost-conscious care. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:147–9. - PubMed
-
- Boat TF, Chao SM, O’Neill PH. From waste to value in health care. JAMA. 2008;299:568–71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
