Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 May;40(5):703-11.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120908. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

Priming primary care physicians to treat osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: an integrated multidisciplinary approach

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Priming primary care physicians to treat osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: an integrated multidisciplinary approach

Sophie Roux et al. J Rheumatol. 2013 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate 2 incremental levels of intervention designed to increase initiation of osteoporosis treatment by primary care physicians (PCP) following fragility fractures (FF).

Methods: Women and men over age 50 years were screened for incident FF in fracture clinics, and eligible outpatients were randomly assigned to standard care (SC) or to either minimal (MIN) or intensive (INT) interventions. The MIN and INT interventions were intended to educate and motivate both patients and PCP, but differed in their frequency of contact and information content. Delivery of osteoporosis medication was confirmed with pharmacists. Treatment rates were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach.

Results: At inclusion, 74.3% of 881 outpatients with FF were untreated. Followup at 12 months was completed in 92.3% of patients. Up to 90% of patients treated at inclusion remained treated at 12 months. Among patients who initially were untreated, 18.8% in the SC group, 40.4% in the MIN, and 53.2% in the INT groups were treated at 12 months. Change in treatment rates (adjusted for age and initial treatment) increased significantly after both MIN and INT. Only the INT intervention significantly increased treatment rates in patients with previous fractures. Negative predictors of change in treatment status included non-major FF, age younger than 65 years, and male sex.

Conclusion: Both interventions significantly increased initiation of osteoporosis treatment. Our multidisciplinary intervention builds on existing first-line structures and uses minimal specialized resources. Iterative and systematic interventions in the context of clinical care may modify the approach of PCP to osteoporosis management after FF and narrow the care gap in the long term.

Keywords: FAMILY PHYSICIANS; FRACTURES; OSTEOPOROSIS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources