Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;21(1):178-84.
doi: 10.1002/oby.20238.

Central adiposity and other anthropometric factors in relation to risk of macrosomia in an African American population

Affiliations

Central adiposity and other anthropometric factors in relation to risk of macrosomia in an African American population

Se Li et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have consistently identified maternal obesity and gestational weight gain (GWG) as risk factors for macrosomia, but little is known about the effects of central adiposity and body fat distribution. Using self-reported data from the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS), a large follow-up study of US black women, we examined the risk of macrosomia in relation to prepregnancy waist circumference, prepregnancy waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), prepregnancy BMI, and GWG.

Design and methods: During 1995-2003, BWHS participants ages 21-44 years delivered 6,687 full-term singleton births (gestational age >37 weeks). We compared mothers of 691 infants weighing ≥ 4,000 g with mothers of 5,996 infants weighing <4,000 g. Generalized estimating equation models (GEE) that accounted for more than one birth per mother were used to estimate multivariable odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Independent of prepregnancy BMI, prepregnancy waist circumference was positively associated with risk of macrosomia (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.07-2.32, for ≥ 35.0 vs. <27.0 inches (≥ 88.9 vs. <68.6 cm); P trend = 0.04). As expected, prepregnancy BMI was also positively associated with macrosomia (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.25-2.41 for BMI ≥ 35.0 vs. 18.5-24.9 kg m(-2)). GWG above the amount recommended by the 2009 Institute of Medicine report was associated with an increased risk of macrosomia and the association was present in each category of prepregnancy BMI (18.5-24.9, 25.0-29.9, and ≥ 30.0 kg m(-2); P trend <0.001).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that overall obesity, high GWG, and high waist circumference are independent risk factors for macrosomia among US black women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURE

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Chapter 38: Fetal Growth Disorders. In: Cunningham FG, LK, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, editors. Williams Obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
    1. Ananth CV, Wen SW. Trends in fetal growth among singleton gestations in the United States and Canada, 1985 through 1998. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:260–267. - PubMed
    1. Odlind V, Haglund B, Pakkanen M, Otterblad Olausson P. Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973–2000. Trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:516–528. - PubMed
    1. Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM, Catalano PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:964–968. - PubMed
    1. Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111:9–14. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms