Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer
- PMID: 2350571
Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer
Abstract
This paper looks at a new approach to the design and analysis of Phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. The basic idea and motivation behind the approach stem from an attempt to reconcile the needs of dose-finding experimentation with the ethical demands of established medical practice. It is argued that for these trials the particular shape of the dose toxicity curve is of little interest. Attention focuses rather on identifying a dose with a given targeted toxicity level and on concentrating experimentation at that which all current available evidence indicates to be the best estimate of this level. Such an approach not only makes an explicit attempt to meet ethical requirements but also enables the use of models whose only requirements are that locally (i.e., around the dose corresponding to the targeted toxicity level) they reasonably well approximate the true probability of toxic response. Although a large number of models could be contemplated, we look at a particularly simple one. Extensive simulations show the model to have real promise.
Comment in
-
Curve-free and model-based continual reassessment method designs.Biometrics. 2002 Mar;58(1):245-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00245.x. Biometrics. 2002. PMID: 11890323
Similar articles
-
A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.Stat Med. 2009 Oct 30;28(24):3012-28. doi: 10.1002/sim.3682. Stat Med. 2009. PMID: 19672839
-
[Continual reassessment method (CRM)].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 Aug;27(9):1449-57. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000. PMID: 10969605 Review. Japanese.
-
Designs for group sequential phase II clinical trials.Biometrics. 1987 Dec;43(4):865-74. Biometrics. 1987. PMID: 3427171
-
Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.Clin Trials. 2007;4(3):235-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774507079442. Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 17715248
-
[Methodological aspects on new protocols in oncology].Bull Cancer. 2008 Oct;95(10):979-83. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0732. Bull Cancer. 2008. PMID: 19004729 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.7043. Epub 2016 Jul 19. Stat Med. 2017. PMID: 27435150 Free PMC article.
-
Designs for phase I trials in ordered groups.Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):254-265. doi: 10.1002/sim.7133. Epub 2016 Sep 14. Stat Med. 2017. PMID: 27624880 Free PMC article.
-
BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL RANDOM-EFFECTS META-ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PHASE I CLINICAL TRIALS.Ann Appl Stat. 2022 Dec;16(4):2481-2504. doi: 10.1214/22-aoas1600. Epub 2022 Sep 26. Ann Appl Stat. 2022. PMID: 36329718 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunities.Trials. 2012 Aug 23;13:145. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-145. Trials. 2012. PMID: 22917111 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A statistical evaluation of dose expansion cohorts in phase I clinical trials.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 20;107(3):dju429. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju429. Print 2015 Mar. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 25710960 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical