Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 18:6:104.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-104.

Sex-differences in reasons for non-participation at recruitment: Geelong Osteoporosis Study

Shikha Markanday  1 , Sharon L Brennan, Haslinda Gould, Julie A Pasco
Affiliations

Sex-differences in reasons for non-participation at recruitment: Geelong Osteoporosis Study

Shikha Markanday et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Understanding reasons for non-participation in health studies can help guide recruitment strategies and inform researchers about potential sources of bias in their study sample. Whilst there is a paucity of literature regarding this issue, it remains highly plausible that men and women may have varied reasons for declining an invitation to participate in research. We aimed to investigate sex-differences in the reasons for non-participation at baseline of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (GOS).

Methods: The GOS, a prospective cohort study, randomly recruited men and women aged 20 years and over from a region in south-eastern Australia using Commonwealth electoral rolls (2001-06 and 1993-97, respectively). Reasons for non-participation (n=1,200) were documented during the two recruitment periods. We used the Pearson's chi squared test to explore differences in the reasons for non-participation between men and women.

Results: Non-participation in the male cohort was greater than in the female cohort (32.9% vs. 22.9%; p<0.001). Overall, there were sex-differences in the reasons provided for non-participation (p<0.001); apparent differences related to time constraints (men 26.3% vs. women 10.4%), frailty/inability to cope with or understand the study (men 18.7% vs. women 30.6%), and reluctance over medical testing (men 1.1% vs women 9.9%). No sex-differences were observed for non-participation related to personal reason/disinterest, and language- or travel-related reasons.

Conclusions: Improving participation rates in epidemiological studies may require different recruitment strategies for men and women in order to address sex-specific concerns about participating in research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reasons for non-participation at baseline recruitment of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (GOS), stratified by sex.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:643–653. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharp L, Cotton SC, Alexander L, Williams E, Gray NM, Reid JM. Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears) Clin Trials. 2006;3:431–442. doi: 10.1177/1740774506070812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pasco JA, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA. Cohort Profile: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1565–1575. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr148. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyle T, Landrigan J, Bulsara C, Fritschi L, Heyworth J. Increasing study participation. Epidemiology. 2011;22:279. - PubMed
    1. Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1143–1156. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types