Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography
- PMID: 23508596
- PMCID: PMC3601385
- DOI: 10.1370/afm.1466
Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer screening programs have the potential of intended beneficial effects, but they also inevitably have unintended harmful effects. In the case of screening mammography, the most frequent harm is a false-positive result. Prior efforts to measure their psychosocial consequences have been limited by short-term follow-up, the use of generic survey instruments, and the lack of a relevant benchmark-women with breast cancer.
Methods: In this cohort study with a 3-year follow-up, we recruited 454 women with abnormal findings in screening mammography over a 1-year period. For each woman with an abnormal finding on a screening mammogram (false and true positives), we recruited another 2 women with normal screening results who were screened the same day at the same clinic. These participants were asked to complete the Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer-a validated questionnaire encompassing 12 psychosocial outcomes-at baseline, 1, 6, 18, and 36 months.
Results: Six months after final diagnosis, women with false-positive findings reported changes in existential values and inner calmness as great as those reported by women with a diagnosis of breast cancer (Δ = 1.15; P = .015; and Δ = 0.13; P = .423, respectively). Three years after being declared free of cancer, women with false-positive results consistently reported greater negative psychosocial consequences compared with women who had normal findings in all 12 psychosocial outcomes (Δ >0 for 12 of 12 outcomes; P <.01 for 4 of 12 outcomes).
Conclusion: False-positive findings on screening mammography causes long-term psychosocial harm: 3 years after a false-positive finding, women experience psychosocial consequences that range between those experienced by women with a normal mammogram and those with a diagnosis of breast cancer.
Figures













Comment in
-
A false-positive on screening mammography has a negative psychosocial impact up to 3 years after receiving the all clear.Evid Based Ment Health. 2013 Nov;16(4):115. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101410. Epub 2013 Jul 12. Evid Based Ment Health. 2013. PMID: 23852830 No abstract available.
-
Some more evidence of long-term psychosocial harms from receiving false-positive screening mammography results.Evid Based Med. 2014 Feb;19(1):38. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101409. Epub 2013 Aug 20. Evid Based Med. 2014. PMID: 23963999 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Psychosocial consequences among women with false-positive results after mammography screening in Norway.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):380-389. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1523985. Epub 2018 Oct 8. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018. PMID: 30296861 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence, Long-term Development, and Predictors of Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography among Women Attending Population-Based Screening.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Sep;24(9):1388-97. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0060. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015. PMID: 26311562
-
Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography: a cohort study with follow-up of 12-14 years in Denmark.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 26;13(4):e072188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072188. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37185642 Free PMC article.
-
[Psychological consequences of breast cancer screening among healthy women].Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Feb 21;162(8):1053-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 2000. PMID: 10741242 Review. Danish.
-
The psychosocial consequences of mammography.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):131-8. doi: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.131. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997. PMID: 9709289 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: Data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness.PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Oct 13;1(10):e0000104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000104. eCollection 2022 Oct. PLOS Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 36812619 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):939-947. doi: 10.1002/pon.5041. Epub 2019 Mar 24. Psychooncology. 2019. PMID: 30812068 Free PMC article.
-
Applying a new computer-aided detection scheme generated imaging marker to predict short-term breast cancer risk.Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 15;63(10):105005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabefe. Phys Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 29667606 Free PMC article.
-
Screening: when things go wrong.Can Fam Physician. 2018 Jul;64(7):502-508. Can Fam Physician. 2018. PMID: 30002025 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ongoing challenges in implementation of lung cancer screening.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2347-2355. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2021-1. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34164282 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Welch HG. Should I Be Tested for Cancer? Maybe Not and Here’s Why. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 2004
-
- Gøtzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jørgensen KJ. Breast screening: the facts—or maybe not. BMJ. 2009;338:b86. - PubMed
-
- Brodersen J, Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. The benefits and harms of screening for cancer with a focus on breast screening. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2010;120(3):89–94 - PubMed
-
- Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(16): 1089–1096 - PubMed
-
- Christiansen CL, Wang F, Barton MB, et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(20):1657–1666 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical