Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):137-44.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1443.

Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

David H Thom et al. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Peer health coaches offer a potential model for extending the capacity of primary care practices to provide self-management support for patients with diabetes. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test whether clinic-based peer health coaching, compared with usual care, improves glycemic control for low-income patients who have poorly controlled diabetes.

Method: We undertook a randomized controlled trial enrolling patients from 6 public health clinics in San Francisco. Twenty-three patients with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level of less than 8.5%, who completed a 36-hour health coach training class, acted as peer coaches. Patients from the same clinics with HbA1C levels of 8.0% or more were recruited and randomized to receive health coaching (n = 148) or usual care (n = 151). The primary outcome was the difference in change in HbA1C levels at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were proportion of patients with a decrease in HbA1C level of 1.0% or more and proportion of patients with an HbA1C level of less than 7.5% at 6 months. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with and without adjustment for differences in baseline variables.

Results: At 6 months, HbA1C levels had decreased by 1.07% in the coached group and 0.3% in the usual care group, a difference of 0.77% in favor of coaching (P = .01, adjusted). HbA1C levels decreased 1.0% or more in 49.6% of coached patients vs 31.5% of usual care patients (P = .001, adjusted), and levels at 6 months were less than 7.5% for 22.0% of coached vs 14.9% of usual care patients (P = .04, adjusted).

Conclusions: Peer health coaching significantly improved diabetes control in this group of low-income primary care patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01040806.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening, randomization, and completion. EHR = electronic health record, HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. a Moved out of area (n = 4), not sure will continue to get care at current clinic (n = 15), enrolled in another study (n = 5), other (n = 24).

References

    1. Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):799–805 - PubMed
    1. Abram M, Nuzum R, Mika S, Lawlor G. Realizing Health Reform’s Potential: How the Affordable Care Act Will Strengthen Primary Care and Benefit Patients, Providers, and Payers. Vol 1. Publication 1466 New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund; 2011 - PubMed
    1. Ferrer RL, Mody-Bailey P, Jaén CR, Gott S, Araujo S. A medical assistant-based program to promote healthy behaviors in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(6):504–512 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):561–587 - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal EL, Brownstein JN, Rush CH, et al. Community health workers: part of the solution. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(7):1338–1342 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data