Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials
- PMID: 2351092
Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials
Abstract
To determine the effect of recording electrode size on the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs), maximally evoked CMAPs were obtained from the abductor digiti minimi muscle in ten normal subjects with circular-shaped surface recording electrodes of different diameters (4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 mm). The electrodes were concentrically located on the same recording point on the muscle at its endplate zones when obtaining the CMAPs. The CMAP onset latency remained unchanged for all recording electrode sizes. The CMAP amplitude decreased with increasing electrode size. The mean absolute amplitude difference between CMAPs recorded with a 4-mm diameter electrode and those with a 14-mm diameter electrode was 1.22 mV, representing an amplitude decrement of 10% with this increase in electrode size. The general shape or morphology of the CMAPs was relatively well preserved.
Similar articles
-
Anodal block: can this occur during routine nerve conduction studies?Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct-Nov;40(7):387-91. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2000. PMID: 11142109
-
[Study on the latency difference between compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials].No To Shinkei. 2001 Jun;53(6):541-5. No To Shinkei. 2001. PMID: 11436338 Japanese.
-
Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jul-Aug;46(4):235-9. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16929630
-
AAEM minimonograph #11: Needle examination in clinical electromyography.Muscle Nerve. 1991 Aug;14(8):685-700. doi: 10.1002/mus.880140802. Muscle Nerve. 1991. PMID: 1890993 Review.
-
Needle electromyography: Basic concepts.Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:243-256. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00016-3. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31277852 Review.
Cited by
-
MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters.Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Oct 17;14:953173. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.953173. eCollection 2022. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36325193 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of surface electrode recording area on compound muscle action potential scan processing for motor unit number estimation.Front Neurosci. 2024 May 22;18:1382871. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1382871. eCollection 2024. Front Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38841095 Free PMC article.