Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Apr;43(4):422-32.
doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.43.422.

Pharmacokinetic studies in animals of a new parenteral penem CP-65,207 and its oral prodrug ester

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Pharmacokinetic studies in animals of a new parenteral penem CP-65,207 and its oral prodrug ester

T Gootz et al. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1990 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of penem CP-65,207 diastereomeric mixture were studied following parenteral administration in mice, rats, beagle dogs and cynomolgus monkeys. As is characteristic for most penems, the serum elimination T1/2 of CP-65,207 in rodents was only 13 minutes for mice and 18 minutes for rats. A linear relationship was observed between dose and Cmax following subcutaneous injection of drug in mice. The T1/2 in the beagle dog and monkey following intravenous injection was approximately 23 minutes. CP-65,207 demonstrated binding to human serum proteins of only 10%. In vitro studies using purified porcine renal dehydropeptidase-I (RDHP) indicated that the pure S-isomer of CP-65,207 was 7-fold more stable to inactivation than imipenem. Urinary recovery of CP-65,207 in the dog was 42% compared to 1% for imipenem without RDHP inhibitor. Unlike results obtained with imipenem, coadministration of probenecid with CP-65,207 in the dog doubled the elimination T1/2 and AUC of the penem demonstrating its relative stability in vivo in the absence of a RDHP inhibitor. The pivaloyloxymethyl esters of each pure isomer of CP-65,207 showed significantly different degrees of oral absorption in rats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms