Assisted fertilization in infertile women with patent fallopian tubes. A comparison of in-vitro fertilization, gamete intra-fallopian transfer and tubal embryo stage transfer
- PMID: 2351708
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137086
Assisted fertilization in infertile women with patent fallopian tubes. A comparison of in-vitro fertilization, gamete intra-fallopian transfer and tubal embryo stage transfer
Abstract
A comparison of the relative efficacy of in-vitro fertilization with uterine embryo transfer (IVF), tubal embryo stage transfer (TEST) and gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) was performed in infertile patients with patent Fallopian tubes. A total of 150 couples with unexplained infertility, peritoneal endometriosis or reduced semen quality were included in the study. The three groups were comparable with regard to age distribution, indications, semen parameters, stimulation regimens, response to stimulation and numbers of oocytes retrieved. In the IVF and TEST groups there was no cleavage in 24% and a cleavage rate of only 47.6%. The highest cleavage rate was obtained in the endometriosis patients. The pregnancy rate was highest in the two groups in which in-vitro fertilization was performed, IVF = 45.7%, TEST = 37.9%, GIFT = 26.2%. To obtain one live intrauterine fetus, more oocytes had to be transferred in the GIFT group compared to the number of embryos in the IVF group, 14.4 versus 6.2, P less than 0.05. Due to a high success rate of IVF but at the same time a high frequency of no cleavage in cases of unexplained infertility or male subfertility, we recommend IVF as the primary procedure in infertile couples with patent Fallopian tubes.
Similar articles
-
GIFT or IVF for patients with patent fallopian tubes?Reprod Fertil Dev. 1992;4(5):589-92. doi: 10.1071/rd9920589. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1992. PMID: 1299834
-
Gamete intra-Fallopian transfer or in-vitro fertilization after failed ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility?Hum Reprod. 1995 Aug;10(8):2023-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136229. Hum Reprod. 1995. PMID: 8567835 Clinical Trial.
-
[Indications of fertilization in vitro (FIV) and intratubal transfer].Rev Prat. 1990 Dec 11;40(29):2685-8. Rev Prat. 1990. PMID: 2281274 Review. French.
-
[Intra-tubal embryo transfer (IVF/IT-ET) in the treatment of non-tubal-induced sterility. Initial studies of the value of a new and expensive therapy procedure].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989 Oct;49(10):894-901. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036106. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1989. PMID: 2583432 German.
-
GIFT, ZIFT, and related techniques.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;5(5):615-22. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8241437 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of the stem pessary to facilitate transcervical embryo transfer in women with cervical stenosis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994 Apr;11(4):225-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02211812. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994. PMID: 7711385 No abstract available.
-
Vaginal bleeding and early pregnancy outcome in an infertile population.J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996 Mar;13(3):212-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02065938. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996. PMID: 8852881
-
Methodology of human embryo transfer following assisted reproduction.J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993 Aug;10(6):393-404. doi: 10.1007/BF01228088. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993. PMID: 8019087 No abstract available.
-
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 27;9(9):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37753821 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro fertilization (IVF): a review of 3 decades of clinical innovation and technological advancement.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2006 Dec;2(4):355-64. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.2006.2.4.355. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2006. PMID: 18360648 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical