Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;169(2):374-83.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.12323.

Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of congenital melanocytic naevus cells support a stem-cell phenotype

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of congenital melanocytic naevus cells support a stem-cell phenotype

V A Kinsler et al. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Aug.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Multiple congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) in one individual are caused by somatic mosaicism for NRAS mutations; however, the lineage of the mutated cells remains uncertain.

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that CMN may be derived from cutaneous stem cells.

Methods: Sixty-six CMN samples from 44 patients were stained for immunohistochemical (IHC) markers of melanocytic differentiation (TYR, TRP1, TRP2, LEF1, MITF, cKit), pluripotency (nestin, fascin, CD133, CD20, CD34), monocyte/macrophage lineage (CD68, CD163, CD14), proliferation (Ki67) and MTOR/Wnt-signalling pathway activation (pS6, β-catenin). Semiquantitative scoring compared samples with naevus cell nesting (group 1) with those with only diffuse dermal infiltration (group 2). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on 10 samples.

Results: A normal melanocyte population was seen overlying many dermal CMN. Group 1 samples were significantly more likely to express melanocytic differentiation markers than group 2, and expression decreased significantly with depth. Expression of these markers was correlated with each other, and with nestin and fascin. CD20 staining was positive in a substantial proportion and was stronger superficially. Expression of β-catenin and pS6 was almost universal. Some samples expressed monocyte/macrophage markers. TEM revealed variable naevus cell morphology, striking macromelanosomes, double cilia and microvilli.

Conclusions: Congenital melanocytic naevi development frequently coexists with normal overlying melanocyte development, leading us to hypothesize that in these cases CMN are likely to develop from a cell present in the skin independent of, or remaining after, normal melanocytic migration. IHC and TEM findings are compatible with CMN cells being of cutaneous stem-cell origin, capable of some degree of melanocytic differentiation superficially.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Staining for tyrosinase in two different samples; (a) ×20, scale bar 100 μm; (b) ×40, scale bar 50 μm; showing a normal melanocyte population along the basement membrane overlying dermal congenital melanocytic naevi.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Positive staining for melanocytic differentiation markers, (a) TRP1 (b) MITF (c) LEF1 and (d) cKit, all showing increased staining superficially and little or no staining deeply. Staining for these markers was generally reduced in samples without a nesting pattern. Staining for (e) nestin, (f) fascin, (g) β-catenin (cytoplasmic) and (h) pS6 showed less variability with depth of the lesional cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Congenital melanocytic naevi samples without a nesting pattern showed (a) CD20 staining in the majority (main picture ×4, scale bar 100 μm; inset from area within black square ×40, scale bar 50 μm); in a small subset (b) CD163 staining naevus cells and dermal dendritic cells (×20, scale bar 100 μm) and (c) CD14 staining naevus cells (×20, scale bar 100 μm).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Transmission electron micrographs of congenital melanocytic naevus cells; (a) naevus cell showing large nucleus with indentations, melanosomes in cytoplasm producing melanin, ×2500, scale bar 500 nm; (b) naevus cells in a nest encased in basal lamina (arrow), ×800, scale bar 2 μm; (c) variability in melanin production between neighbouring cells, ×5000, scale bar 1 μm; (d) inclusion body in nucleus (arrow), ×2000, scale bar 2 μm; (e) inclusion bodies in cytoplasm, and microvilli (arrow), ×1200, scale bar 2 μm; (f) macromelanosome complex, ×12 000, scale bar 500 nm; (g) double cilia seen as parallel lines (arrow), scale bar 500 nm; (h) cluster of naevus cells in macroscopically normal skin, ×3000, scale bar 2 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Perifollicular patterning of pigmentation at the borders of a single congenital melanocytic naevus (CMN) pre-resection, and (b) perifollicular regrowth after total macroscopic resection, suggestive of a hair follicle-associated reservoir of naevus cells; (c) palmoplantar CMNs are common in individuals with multiple CMNs, indicating that CMNs can also arise in areas devoid of hair follicles.

References

    1. Kinsler VA, Thomas AC, Ishida M, et al. Multiple congenital melanocytic nevi and neurocutaneous melanosis are caused by postzygotic mutations in codon 61 of NRAS. J Invest Dermatol. 2013 [Epub ahead of print] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnhill RL, Piepkorn MW, Busam KJ. Pathology of Melanocytic Nevi and Malignant Melanoma. New York, NY: Springer; 2004.
    1. Clemmensen OJ, Kroon S. The histology of ‘congenital features’ in early acquired melanocytic nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;19:742–6. - PubMed
    1. Misago N. The relationship between melanocytes and peripheral nerve sheath cells (Part I): melanocytic nevus (excluding so-called ‘blue nevus’) with peripheral nerve sheath differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:217–29. - PubMed
    1. McCann E, Fryer AE, Kokai G. Congenital melanocytic naevus with associated neurofibroma and schwannoma-like change. Clin Dysmorphol. 2005;14:159–60. - PubMed

Publication types