Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Aug;258(2):240-7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c0b85.

Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations

Amy C Degnim et al. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether bacterial colonization of drains can be reduced by local antiseptic interventions.

Background: Drains are a potential source of bacterial entry into surgical wounds and may contribute to surgical site infection after breast surgery.

Methods: After institutional review board approval, patients undergoing total mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection were randomized to standard drain care (control) or drain antisepsis (treated). Standard drain care comprised twice daily cleansing with alcohol swabs. Antisepsis drain care included (1) a chlorhexidine disc at the drain exit site and (2) irrigation of the drain bulb twice daily with dilute sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's) solution. Culture results of drain fluid and tubing were compared between control and antisepsis groups.

Results: Overall, 100 patients with 125 drains completed the study with 48 patients (58 drains) in the control group and 52 patients (67 drains) in the antisepsis group. Cultures of drain bulb fluid at 1 week were positive (1+ or greater growth) in 66% (38/58) of control drains compared with 21% (14/67) of antisepsis drains (P = 0.0001). Drain tubing cultures demonstrated more than 50 colony-forming units in 19% (8/43) of control drains versus 0% (0/53) of treated drains (P = 0.004). Surgical site infection was diagnosed in 6 patients (6%)--5 patients in the control group and 1 patient in the antisepsis group (P = 0.06).

Conclusions: Simple and inexpensive local antiseptic interventions with a chlorhexidine disc and hypochlorite solution reduce bacterial colonization of drains. Based on these data, further study of drain antisepsis and its potential impact on surgical site infection rate is warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01286168).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Chlorhexidine disc dressing with occlusive adherent dressing.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Frequency of bacterial growth in surgical drain fluid and tubing as a function of time. A, Drain fluid cultures. B, Drain tubing cultures. Positive culture was defined as 1+ or greater growth from fluid and greater than 50 CFU from tubing.

References

    1. Prospero E, Cavicchi A, Bacelli S, et al. Surveillance for surgical site infection after hospital discharge: a surgical procedure-specific perspective. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(12):1313–1317. - PubMed
    1. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(10):783–805. - PubMed
    1. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, et al. Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(2):467–476. - PubMed
    1. Ruvalcaba-Limon E, Robles-Vidal C, Poitevin-Chacon A, et al. Complications after breast cancer surgery in patients treated with concomitant preoperative chemoradiation: A case-control analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;95(2):147–152. - PubMed
    1. Vilar-Compte D, Jacquemin B, Robles-Vidal C, et al. Surgical site infections in breast surgery: case-control study. World J Surg. 2004;28(3):242–246. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data