Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;17(2):193-202.
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182616241.

Screening for cervical cancer: a modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Shalini L Kulasingam  1 , Laura J Havrilesky, Rahel Ghebre, Evan R Myers
Affiliations

Screening for cervical cancer: a modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Shalini L Kulasingam et al. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: This study addresses the following 3 questions posed by the US Preventive Services Task Force: (1) at what age should screening for cervical cancer begin; (2) at what age should screening for cervical cancer end; and (3) how do the benefits and potential harms of screening strategies that use human papillomavirus DNA testing in conjunction with cytology (cotesting) compare with those strategies that use cytology only?

Materials and methods: A Markov model was updated and used to quantify clinical outcomes (i.e., colposcopies, cancers, and life expectancy) associated with different screening strategies.

Results: Screening in the teenaged years is associated with a high number of colposcopies (harms), small differences in cancers detected and, as a result, small gains in life expectancy (benefits). Screening women beginning in the early 20s provides a reasonable balance of the harms and benefits of screening. Among women who have been screened according to the current recommendations for cervical cancer (beginning at age 21 years and conducted every 3 years with cytology), screening beyond 65 years is associated with small additional gains in life expectancy but large increases in colposcopies. For cotesting, a strategy of cytology only conducted every 3 years, followed by cotesting conducted every 5 years (for women ≥30 years), is associated with fewer colposcopies and greater gains in life expectancy compared with screening with cytology only conducted every 3 years.

Conclusions: The results of this modeling study support current US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for cervical cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

For the remaining authors no conflicts of interest are declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Efficiency curve comparing strategies that differ by age of first screening. Strategies presented are those identified as efficient using incremental colposcopies per life-year. *Note: the steep part of the curve is considered to include the most efficient strategies, since these provide more life expectancy gains per colposcopy than the flatter part of the curve where progressively smaller life expectancy gains occur for an increasing number of colposcopies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Efficiency curve* comparing strategies that differ based on age to end screening among women who have not been screened prior to age 65 (1) and among women who have been screened every 3 years beginning at age 21, to age 65 (2). Screening is varied by interval (q1, q2 (for those who have not been screened prior to age 65; q3 and q5) and age to end (70, 75, 80, 85, 90). Strategies presented are those identified as efficient using colposcopies per (undiscounted) life-years. *Note: the steep part of the curve is considered to include the most efficient strategies, since these provide more life expectancy gains per colposcopy than the flatter part of the curve where progressively smaller life expectancy gains occur for an increasing number of colposcopies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Efficiency curve comparing strategies based on cytology either alone or in combination with HPV. Strategies presented are those identified as efficient using incremental colposcopies per life year. *Note: the steep part of the curve is considered to include the most efficient strategies, since these provide more life expectancy gains per colposcopy than the flatter part of the curve where progressively smaller life expectancy gains occur for an increasing number of colposcopies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Howlader N NA, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, Edwards BK, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2011. http://seercancergov/csr/1975_2008/, based on November 2010 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site.
    1. Gustafsson L, Ponten J, Zack M, Adami HO. International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening. CA Causes Control. 1997 Sep;8(5):755–763. - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA. Screening for Cervical Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 14; - PubMed
    1. Koliopoulos G, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Kyrgiou M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jan;104(1):232–246. - PubMed
    1. Myers ER, McCrory DC, Nanda K, Bastian L, Matchar DB. Mathematical model for the natural history of human papillomavirus infection and cervical carcinogenesis. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun 15;151(12):1158–1171. - PubMed

Publication types