Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 12;77(2):25.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe77225.

Academic progression and retention policies of colleges and schools of pharmacy

Therese I Poirier  1 , Theresa M Kerr, Stephanie J Phelps
Affiliations

Academic progression and retention policies of colleges and schools of pharmacy

Therese I Poirier et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe academic progression and retention policies used by US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Methods: Student handbooks on the Web sites of 122 colleges and schools of pharmacy were reviewed between February 2012 and May 2012.

Results: Data were available and obtained from 98 (80%) programs. Most used grade point average (GPA) as a criterion for progression, with 66% requiring a minimum GPA of 2.0. Cumulative GPA was the most frequently used criteria for probation. Most handbooks did not address remediation, but 38% noted that a failed course could only be retaken once. The most common criteria for dismissal were the cumulative number of times a student was on probation. The graduation requirements of most programs were a cumulative GPA of 2.0 and completion of the program within 6 years of enrollment.

Conclusions: Colleges and schools of pharmacy use various criteria for academic progression and retention and frequently provide incomplete or inadequate information related to probation, progression, and dismissal. Information regarding remediation and academic performance during experiential learning is lacking. A clearinghouse containing institutional data related to progression and retention would assist programs in developing academic policies. The study also highlights the need for ACPE to ensure this information is provided to students.

Keywords: education; pharmacy; progression; remediation; retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Accreditation Standards and Guidelines 2007, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/ACPE_Revised_PharmD_Standards_Adopted_.... Accessed October 5, 2011.
    1. Maize DF, Fuller SH, Hritcko PM, et al. A review of remediation programs in pharmacy and other health professions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(2):Article 25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lobb WB, Wilkin NE. Admission and progression standards at US schools and colleges of pharmacy: an exploration of criteria changes. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67(3):Article 93.
    1. Kerr T, Poirier T, Phelps S. Am J Pharm Educ. 5. Vol. 76. Kissimmee, FL: July 14-18, 2012. 2012. An evaluation of academic standards and progression policies of colleges or schools of pharmacy. 113th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy; p. Article 99. http://www.ajpe.org/doi/full/10.5688/ajpe76599. Accessed September 24, 2012. - DOI
    1. Kelly WN, Sogol EM, editors. The Good Pharmacist: Characteristics, Virtues, and Habits. Oldsmar, FL: William N. Kelly Consulting Inc; 2011.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources