Essential tremor 10, 20, 30, 40: clinical snapshots of the disease by decade of duration
- PMID: 23521518
- PMCID: PMC3653981
- DOI: 10.1111/ene.12123
Essential tremor 10, 20, 30, 40: clinical snapshots of the disease by decade of duration
Abstract
Background and purpose: Essential tremor (ET) is a chronic, progressive neurological disorder in which disease burden may slowly accrue. There are few long-term studies, and the clinical and functional status of patients, with each decade of disease duration, has not been documented in detail. We used cross-sectional data on 335 patients with ET (disease duration 1-81 years) to produce clinical snapshots of the disease at each 10-year milestone (i.e. < 10, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, ≥ 40 years). We hope these data will be of value in clinical-prognostic settings both to patients and their treating physicians.
Methods: In this cross-sectional, clinical-epidemiological study at Columbia-University Medical Center, each patient underwent a single evaluation, including self-reported measures of tremor-related disability, performance-based measures of function, and neurologist-assessments of tremor type, location and severity.
Results: A variety of metrics of tremor severity increased across the 10-year time intervals. By ≥ 40 years duration, one-third of patients had tremor in at least two cranial locations (neck, voice, jaw), and the proportion with high-amplitude tremor reached 20.3% (while drawing spirals), 33.8% (spilling while drinking) and 60.8% (spilling while using a spoon). Yet even in the longest tremor duration group, very few (< 10%) were incapacitated (i.e. completely unable to perform the above-mentioned tasks), and one-third continued to exhibit no cranial tremor.
Conclusions: These data paint a picture of progressive decade-by-decade decline in ET. Yet patients with long disease duration did not relentlessly converge at the same end-stage of severe, functionally incapacitating, diffuse tremor. In this respect, long-duration ET patients presented a heterogeneous picture.
© 2013 The Author(s) European Journal of Neurology © 2013 EFNS.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Comment in
-
Assessment of long-term outcome in neurological disease.J Neurol. 2013 Jun;260(6):1693-5. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-6966-3. J Neurol. 2013. PMID: 23719788 No abstract available.
References
-
- Benito-Leon J, Louis ED. Clinical update: diagnosis and treatment of essential tremor. Lancet. 2007;369:1152–1154. - PubMed
-
- Louis ED, Barnes L, Albert SM, et al. Correlates of functional disability in essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2001;16:914–920. - PubMed
-
- Nguyen HV, Ngian V, Cordato D, Shen Q, Chan DK. Quality of life in a random sample of community dwelling older patients with essential tremor. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007;116:289–292. - PubMed
-
- Lorenz D, Poremba C, Papengut F, Schreiber S, Deuschl G. The psychosocial burden of essential tremor in an outpatient- and a community-based cohort. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18:972–979. - PubMed
-
- Troster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE. Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11:367–373. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources