Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain
- PMID: 23524871
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182917299
Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain
Abstract
Study design: Cross-sectional evaluation of the psychometric properties of a translated questionnaire.
Objective: To validate the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) to allow its use with Italian-speaking patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
Summary of background data: Growing attention is being given to cognitive-behavioral measures to improve interventions for LBP. The CPAQ has never been validated in Italian subjects with chronic LBP.
Methods: The psychometric testing included confirmatory factor analysis, reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach α), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), sensitivity to change by calculating the smallest detectable change, and construct validity by comparing CPAQ with a pain numerical rating scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (Pearson correlations). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were computed to further investigate construct validity of the CPAQ subscales.
Results: The questionnaire was administered to 142 subjects with chronic LBP. Factor analysis confirmed a 2-factor (viz., Activities Engagement and Pain Willingness) 20-item solution, achieving a good data-model fit. Internal consistency (α = 0.88) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86) were good. The smallest detectable change was 22. Construct validity showed a moderate correlation between the CPAQ and numerical rating scale (r = -0.485), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Scale (r = -0.594), and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (r = -0.595), and a close correlation with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (r = -0.610 for the Anxiety score and r = -0.659 for the Depression score) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (r = -0.658). The standardized regression coefficients for Activity Engagement were significant in all of the equations, and those for Pain Willingness were significant in the anxiety, depression, and disability equations.
Conclusion: The Italian CPAQ had a good factorial structure and psychometric properties that replicated the results of other versions. Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes.
Level of evidence: 2.
Similar articles
-
The Italian version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 15;37(6):E374-80. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ff5a7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22422439
-
Development of the Italian Version of the Neck Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):E1038-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182579795. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22487712
-
Development of the Italian Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability and Validity.Int J Behav Med. 2016 Apr;23(2):214-23. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9507-x. Int J Behav Med. 2016. PMID: 26362465
-
A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency.Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(25):2367-74. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647. Epub 2015 Mar 4. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25738913 Review.
-
Questionnaires for the evaluation of the cervical and lumbar spine in Italian language: a systematic review of the structural and psychometric characteristics.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun;57(3):376-385. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06280-2. Epub 2020 Dec 1. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 33258360
Cited by
-
Immediate Effects of Multiple Ischemic Compression Applications on Pain Sensitivity and Biomechanical Properties of Myofascial Trigger Points.Clin Pract. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):125. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15070125. Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 40710035 Free PMC article.
-
Pain Acceptance and Its Associated Factors among Cancer Patients in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 13;2019:9458683. doi: 10.1155/2019/9458683. eCollection 2019. Pain Res Manag. 2019. PMID: 30906486 Free PMC article.
-
A bifactor structural model of the Hungarian Pain Catastrophizing Scale and latent classes of a clinical sample.Heliyon. 2021 Sep 20;7(9):e08026. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08026. eCollection 2021 Sep. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 34604562 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention with a waiting list control among adults with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 2;4(7):e005092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005092. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 24993763 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Association between seated trunk control and cortical sensorimotor white matter brain changes in patients with chronic low back pain.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0309344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309344. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39208294 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous