(Sample) size matters! An examination of sample size from the SPRINT trial study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures
- PMID: 23525086
- PMCID: PMC3510324
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182647e0e
(Sample) size matters! An examination of sample size from the SPRINT trial study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures
Abstract
Introduction: Inadequate sample size and power in randomized trials can result in misleading findings. This study demonstrates the effect of sample size in a large clinical trial by evaluating the results of the Study to Prospectively evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial fractures (SPRINT) trial as it progressed.
Methods: The SPRINT trial evaluated reamed versus unreamed nailing of the tibia in 1226 patients, and in open and closed fracture subgroups (N = 400 and N = 826, respectively). We analyzed the reoperation rates and relative risk comparing treatment groups at 50, 100, and then increments of 100 patients up to the final sample size. Results at various enrollments were compared with the final SPRINT findings.
Results: In the final analysis, there was a statistically significant decreased risk of reoperation with reamed nails for closed fractures (relative risk reduction 35%). Results for the first 35 patients enrolled suggested that reamed nails increased the risk of reoperation in closed fractures by 165%. Only after 543 patients with closed fractures were enrolled did the results reflect the final advantage for reamed nails in this subgroup. Similarly, the trend toward an increased risk of reoperation for open fractures (23%) was not seen until 62 patients with open fractures were enrolled.
Conclusions: Our findings highlight the risk of conducting a trial with insufficient sample size and power. Such studies are not only at risk of missing true effects but also of giving misleading results.
Figures
Comment in
-
(Effect) size matters!J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Apr;27(4):188-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826ba296. J Orthop Trauma. 2013. PMID: 22874116 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Economic evaluation of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed and open tibial fractures: results from the study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT).Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.034. Epub 2011 May 25. Value Health. 2011. PMID: 21669369 Clinical Trial.
-
Reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures: a subgroup analysis of randomised trials.Int Orthop. 2010 Dec;34(8):1307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0895-x. Epub 2009 Oct 20. Int Orthop. 2010. PMID: 19841919 Free PMC article.
-
Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): study rationale and design.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jun 23;9:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-91. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008. PMID: 18573205 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A critical appraisal of the SPRINT trial.Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.008. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20399363 Review.
-
Closed tibial shaft fractures: management and treatment complications. A review of the prospective literature.Can J Surg. 2000 Aug;43(4):256-62. Can J Surg. 2000. PMID: 10948685 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Searching for a Consensus Among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Studies: A Systematic Meta-Analysis.Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jan 5;29(1):125-139. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac194. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023. PMID: 36112501 Free PMC article.
-
A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing Bankart repair and remplissage with the Latarjet procedure in patients with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): study protocol.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 31;8(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00987-4. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022. PMID: 35101120 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of antimicrobial coated orthopaedic implants on the prevention of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Bone Jt Infect. 2020 Jun 27;5(4):212-222. doi: 10.7150/jbji.44839. eCollection 2020. J Bone Jt Infect. 2020. PMID: 32670776 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of persistent pain with lidocaine infusions in breast cancer surgery (PLAN): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2024 May 22;25(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08151-4. Trials. 2024. PMID: 38773653 Free PMC article.
-
Cochrane in CORR®: surgery for rotator cuff disease (review).Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3263-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3869-2. Epub 2014 Aug 15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 25123244 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Lochner HV, Bhandari M, Tornetta P., III Type-II error rates (beta errors) of randomized trials in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1650–5. - PubMed
-
- Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. Marcel Dekker Inc; New York: 2003. Large sample tests for proportions; pp. 81–113.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical