Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;68(2):213-8.
doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(02)oa15.

Interobserver agreement for the spine instability neoplastic score varies according to the experience of the evaluator

Affiliations

Interobserver agreement for the spine instability neoplastic score varies according to the experience of the evaluator

William Gemio Jacobsen Teixeira et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the interobserver agreement for the Neoplastic Spine Instability Score (SINS) among spine surgeons with or without experience in vertebral metastasis treatment and physicians in other specialties.

Methods: Case descriptions were produced based on the medical records of 40 patients with vertebral metastases. The descriptions were then published online. Physicians were invited to evaluate the descriptions by answering questions according to the Neoplastic Spine Instability Score (SINS). The agreement among physicians was calculated using the kappa coefficient.

Results: Seventeen physicians agreed to participate: three highly experienced spine surgeons, seven less-experienced spine surgeons, three surgeons of other specialties, and four general practitioners (n = 17). The agreement for the final SINS score among all participants was fair, and it varied according to the SINS component. The agreement was substantial for the spine location only. The agreement was higher among experienced surgeons. The agreement was nearly perfect for spinal location among the spine surgeons who were highly experienced in vertebral metastases.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the experience of the evaluator has an impact on SINS scale classification. The interobserver agreement was only fair among physicians who were not spine surgeons and among spine surgeons who were not experienced in the treatment of vertebral metastases, which may limit the use of the SINS scale for the screening of unstable lesions by less-experienced evaluators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a clinical case used in the evaluations. “Forty one-years-old patient with a diagnosis of metastatic colon adenocarcinoma. He has a complaint of progressive dorsal pain which is worse at night and with movement. The patient has a limited ability to move on the bed due to dorsal pain.” A. Anteroposterior and profile radiographs. B. Axial cut in computed tomography showing the lesion site.

References

    1. Schiff D, O'Neill BP, Suman VJ. Spinal epidural metastasis as the initial manifestation of malignancy: clinical features and diagnostic approach. Neurology. 1997;49(2):452–6. - PubMed
    1. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, Payne R, Saris S, Kryscio RJ, et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):643–8. - PubMed
    1. Sundaresan N, Digiacinto GV, Hughes JE, Cafferty M, Vallejo A. Treatment of neoplastic spinal cord compression: results of a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 1991;29(5):645–50. - PubMed
    1. Constans JP, de Divitiis E, Donzelli R, Spaziante R, Meder JF, Haye C. Spinal metastases with neurological manifestations. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(1):111–8. Review of 600 cases. - PubMed
    1. Eastley N, Newey M, Ashford RU. Skeletal metastases - The role of the orthopaedic and spinal surgeon. Surg Oncol. 2012. [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources