Methodology issues and misleading information in: "User evaluation of two electronic mobility aids for persons who are visually impaired: a quasi-experimental study using a standardized mobility course," by Roentgen, Gelderblom, and de Witte, Assistive Technology, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp. 110-120
- PMID: 23527432
- DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2013.759447
Methodology issues and misleading information in: "User evaluation of two electronic mobility aids for persons who are visually impaired: a quasi-experimental study using a standardized mobility course," by Roentgen, Gelderblom, and de Witte, Assistive Technology, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp. 110-120
Comment in
-
Response to letter to the editor.Assist Technol. 2013 Spring;25(1):60-1. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2013.759449. Assist Technol. 2013. PMID: 23527433 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
User evaluation of two electronic mobility aids for persons who are visually impaired: a quasi-experimental study using a standardized mobility course.Assist Technol. 2012 Summer;24(2):110-20; quiz 121-2. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2012.659794. Assist Technol. 2012. PMID: 22876733
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous