Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;120(8):932-9.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12193. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

The impact of body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study in a UK obstetric population, 2004-2011

R Scott-Pillai  1 , D Spence, C R Cardwell, A Hunter, V A Holmes
Affiliations

The impact of body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study in a UK obstetric population, 2004-2011

R Scott-Pillai et al. BJOG. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the prevalence of overweight and obesity, and the impact of body mass index (BMI) on maternal and neonatal outcomes, in a UK obstetric population.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: A tertiary referral unit in Northern Ireland.

Population: A total of 30 298 singleton pregnancies over an 8-year period, 2004-2011.

Methods: Women were categorised according to World Health Organization classification: underweight (BMI < 18.50 kg/m(2)); normal weight (BMI 18.50-24.99 kg/m(2); reference group); overweight (BMI 25.00-29.99 kg/m(2)); obese class I (BMI 30.00-34.99 kg/m(2)); obese class II (BMI 35-39.99 kg/m(2)); and obese class III (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2)). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were examined using logistic regression, adjusted for confounding variables.

Main outcome measures: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results: Compared with women of normal weight, women who were overweight or obese class I were at significantly increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 1.9, 99% CI 1.7-2.3; OR 3.5, 99% CI 2.9-4.2); gestational diabetes mellitus (OR 1.7, 99% CI 1.3-2.3; OR 3.7, 99% CI 2.8-5.0); induction of labour (OR 1.2, 99% CI 1.1-1.3; OR 1.3, 99% CI 1.2-1.5); caesarean section (OR 1.4, 99% CI 1.3-1.5; OR 1.8, 99% CI 1.6-2.0); postpartum haemorrhage (OR 1.4, 99% CI 1.3-1.5; OR 1.8, 1.6-2.0); and macrosomia (OR 1.5, 99% CI 1.3-1.6; OR 1.9, 99% CI 1.6-2.2), with the risks increasing for obese classes II and III. Women in obese class III were at increased risk of preterm delivery (OR 1.6, 99% CI 1.1-2.5), stillbirth (OR 3.0, 99% CI 1.0-9.3), postnatal stay > 5 days (OR 2.1, 99% CI 1.5-3.1), and infant requiring admission to a neonatal unit (OR 1.6, 99% CI 1.0-2.6).

Conclusions: By categorising women into overweight and obesity subclassifications (classes I -III), this study clearly demonstrates an increasing risk of adverse outcomes across BMI categories, with women who are overweight also at significant risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources