Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;31(2):202-10.
doi: 10.1177/1049909113482039. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

Methods for improving the quality of palliative care delivery: a systematic review

Brandyn D Lau  1 , Rebecca A Aslakson, Renee F Wilson, Oluwakemi A Fawole, Colleen C Apostol, Kathryn A Martinez, Daniela Vollenweider, Eric B Bass, Sydney E Morss Dy
Affiliations

Methods for improving the quality of palliative care delivery: a systematic review

Brandyn D Lau et al. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness for improving the outcomes across palliative care domains remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review of different types of quality improvement interventions relevant to palliative care.

Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane for relevant articles published between 2000 and 2011.

Results: A total of 10 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized controlled trials were included. Of the 5 studies using relay of clinical information, 1 reported significant improvement in patient quality of life. Of the 5 studies targeting education and self-management, 4 found significant improvements in quality of life or patient symptoms.

Conclusion: A minority of quality improvement interventions have succeeded in improving the quality of palliative care delivery. More studies are needed on specific quality improvement types, including organizational change and multiple types of interventions.

Keywords: comparative effectiveness; end of life; quality improvement; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of the literature search and article screening for applicability. *The sum of reasons for exclusion at abstract screening is greater than the total number of exclusions as each reviewer could select a different reason for exclusion. †The sum of reasons for exclusion at article screening is greater than the total number of exclusions as each reviewer could select a different reason for exclusion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Qaseem A, Snow V, Shekelle P, Casey DE, Jr, Cross JT, Jr, Owens DK, Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Dallas P, Dolan NC, Forciea MA, et al. Evidence-based interventions to improve the palliative care of pain, dyspnea, and depression at the end of life: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(2):141–146. - PubMed
    1. Danz MS, Rubenstein LV, Hempel S, et al. Identifying quality improvement intervention evaluations: is consensus achievable? Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(4):279–283. - PubMed
    1. Shojania KG, M. K, Wachter RM, Owens DK. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD: 2004. Report nr 1. - PubMed
    1. O’Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD000409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, et al. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(8):CD000125. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types