Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013:2013:793091.
doi: 10.1155/2013/793091. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

From ontology to semantic similarity: calculation of ontology-based semantic similarity

Affiliations
Review

From ontology to semantic similarity: calculation of ontology-based semantic similarity

Mingxin Gan et al. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013.

Abstract

Advances in high-throughput experimental techniques in the past decade have enabled the explosive increase of omics data, while effective organization, interpretation, and exchange of these data require standard and controlled vocabularies in the domain of biological and biomedical studies. Ontologies, as abstract description systems for domain-specific knowledge composition, hence receive more and more attention in computational biology and bioinformatics. Particularly, many applications relying on domain ontologies require quantitative measures of relationships between terms in the ontologies, making it indispensable to develop computational methods for the derivation of ontology-based semantic similarity between terms. Nevertheless, with a variety of methods available, how to choose a suitable method for a specific application becomes a problem. With this understanding, we review a majority of existing methods that rely on ontologies to calculate semantic similarity between terms. We classify existing methods into five categories: methods based on semantic distance, methods based on information content, methods based on properties of terms, methods based on ontology hierarchy, and hybrid methods. We summarize characteristics of each category, with emphasis on basic notions, advantages and disadvantages of these methods. Further, we extend our review to software tools implementing these methods and applications using these methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schulze A, Downward J. Navigating gene expression using microarrays—a technology review. Nature Cell Biology. 2001;3(8):E190–E195. - PubMed
    1. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(8):4569–4574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein'protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2000;403:623–627. - PubMed
    1. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):198–207. - PubMed
    1. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology. 2007;25(11):1251–1255. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources