Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 May;22(4):718-30.
doi: 10.1007/s10646-013-1064-y. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

Comparing the sensitivity of geographically distinct Lemna minor populations to atrazine

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing the sensitivity of geographically distinct Lemna minor populations to atrazine

Rebecca L Dalton et al. Ecotoxicology. 2013 May.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare the sensitivities of field populations and a laboratory culture of a duckweed species (Lemna minor) to the herbicide atrazine using three different endpoints and to determine whether sensitivity to atrazine was affected by past exposure to the herbicide. L. minor cultures were purchased commercially or collected from field sites within an agricultural watershed and exposed to atrazine for 7 days under greenhouse conditions. Populations differed significantly in their sensitivity to atrazine. Biomass was more sensitive than frond number, while chlorophyll fluorescence was not a sensitive endpoint. Overall, the sensitivity of the various populations to atrazine was not strongly related to measures of past exposure to agriculture stressors. Positive correlations between biomass twenty-five percent inhibition concentrations (IC25s), biomass estimated marginal means and in-stream atrazine concentrations were observed, providing evidence that atrazine exposure is linked to a decrease in sensitivity to atrazine. However, IC25s generated for each population were similar, ranging from 19 to 40 and 57 to 92 μg/L atrazine for biomass and frond data respectively, and likely do not represent biologically significant differences in atrazine sensitivity. Given the small range in sensitivity observed between populations, commercial laboratory cultures appear to provide a good estimate of the sensitivity of field populations of L. minor to atrazine and should continue to be used in regulatory phytotoxicity testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 Jul;53(1):120-6 - PubMed
    1. Environ Int. 2004 Aug;30(6):811-4 - PubMed
    1. Chemosphere. 2011 Feb;82(8):1155-60 - PubMed
    1. Environ Toxicol. 2005 Feb;20(1):67-73 - PubMed
    1. Aquat Toxicol. 2010 Mar 1;96(4):256-63 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources