Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 1;190(9):4553-61.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202916. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

IL-27 receptor signaling regulates CD4+ T cell chemotactic responses during infection

Affiliations

IL-27 receptor signaling regulates CD4+ T cell chemotactic responses during infection

Emily Gwyer Findlay et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

IL-27 exerts pleiotropic suppressive effects on naive and effector T cell populations during infection and inflammation. Surprisingly, however, the role of IL-27 in restricting or shaping effector CD4(+) T cell chemotactic responses, as a mechanism to reduce T cell-dependent tissue inflammation, is unknown. In this study, using Plasmodium berghei NK65 as a model of a systemic, proinflammatory infection, we demonstrate that IL-27R signaling represses chemotaxis of infection-derived splenic CD4(+) T cells in response to the CCR5 ligands, CCL4 and CCL5. Consistent with these observations, CCR5 was expressed on significantly higher frequencies of splenic CD4(+) T cells from malaria-infected, IL-27R-deficient (WSX-1(-/-)) mice than from infected wild-type mice. We find that IL-27 signaling suppresses splenic CD4(+) T cell CCR5-dependent chemotactic responses during infection by restricting CCR5 expression on CD4(+) T cell subtypes, including Th1 cells, and also by controlling the overall composition of the CD4(+) T cell compartment. Diminution of the Th1 response in infected WSX-1(-/-) mice in vivo by neutralization of IL-12p40 attenuated CCR5 expression by infection-derived CD4(+) T cells and also reduced splenic CD4(+) T cell chemotaxis toward CCL4 and CCL5. These data reveal a previously unappreciated role for IL-27 in modulating CD4(+) T cell chemotactic pathways during infection, which is related to its capacity to repress Th1 effector cell development. Thus, IL-27 appears to be a key cytokine that limits the CCR5-CCL4/CCL5 axis during inflammatory settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. WSX-1 signalling restricts CD4+ T cell chemotactic responses during malaria infection
WT and WSX-1−/− mice were infected with 104 P. berghei NK65 pRBCs. Splenic CD4+ T cells were purified from naïve and malaria-infected mice (D14 p.i.). (A,B), 1 ×106 purified (A) naïve, or (B) infection-derived, CD4+ T cells were placed in duplicate in the top chamber of a 5μm transwell and migration of cells towards recombinant chemokines (all at 100ng/ml) in the bottom chamber was assessed by microscopy. Data are the mean +/− SEM of the group and are representative of 5 independent experiments. * P<0.05, WT vs WSX-1−/− mice.
Figure 2
Figure 2. SX-1 signalling restricts CCR5 expression on CD4+ T cells during malaria infection
WT and WSX-1−/− mice were infected with 104 P. berghei NK65 pRBCs. (A) Representative plots (gated on CD4+ T cells) showing the surface expression of chemokine receptors on splenic CD4+ T cells from naïve and infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice. (B, C) frequencies of splenic CD4+ T cells from (B) naïve and (C) malaria infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice expressing chemokine receptors on the cell surface. (D) The frequencies of splenic CD4+ T cells from malaria infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice expressing intracellular chemokine receptors. (E) The frequencies of splenic CD4+ T cells from malaria-infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and IL-10R−/− mice expressing chemokine receptors on the cell surface. Data are the mean +/− SEM of the group with 3-5 mice per group. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (B-D) * P<0.05, WT vs WSX-1−/− mice. (F) * P<0.05, WT vs IL-10R−/− mice.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Loss of WSX-1 signalling leads to remodelling of the CD4+CCR5+ T cell compartment and increased numbers of Th1-CCR5+ T cells during malaria infection
WT and WSX-1−/− mice were infected with 104 P. berghei NK65 pRBCs. (A) Representative plots showing the surface expression of T cell markers on splenic CD4+ CCR5+ T cells from naïve and infectied (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice. (B, C) frequencies and (D, E) numbers of splenic CD4+CCR5+ T cells from (B, D) naïve and (C, E) malaria infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice expressing the individual markers. (D, E) Numbers of cells calculated out of the 1×106 purified CD4+ T cells used in chemotaxis assays. Data are the mean +/− SEM of the group with 3-5 mice per group and are representative of 4 independent experiments. * P<0.05, WT vs WSX-1−/− mice.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Loss of WSX-1 signalling modifies the structure of the CD4+ T cell population but also leads to unconstrained CCR5 expression on CD4+ T cell subsets during malaria infection
WT and WSX-1−/− mice were infected with 104 P. berghei NK65 pRBCs. (A) Frequencies of splenic CD4+ T cells from naïve and infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice expressing the various T cell markers. (B, C) The numbers of CD4+ T cells derived from naïve and infection-derived (D14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice expressing the various T cell subset markers out of (B) 1 ×106 CD4+ T cells utilised in the chemotaxis assay and (C) total splenocytes. (D) Representative histograms (gated on CD4+ Marker+ T cells) showing the surface expression of CCR5 on splenic CD4+ T cells from naïve and infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice. (E, F) frequencies and (G) MFI of CCR5 expression on (E) naïve and (F, G) malaria-infection derived (day 14 p.i.) splenic CD4+ Marker+ T cells. Data are the mean +/− SEM of the group with 3-5 mice per group and are representative of 4 independent experiments. * P<0.05, WT vs WSX-1−/− mice.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Coordinated expression of CCR5 with IL-12R on CD4+ T cells derived from malaria-infected WSX-1−/− mice
WT and WSX-1−/− mice were infected with 104 P. berghei NK65 pRBCs. (A) Representative plots (gated on CD4+ T cells) showing the surface expression of CCR5 versus IL-12Rβ1 and CD25 on splenic CD4+ T cells from naïve and infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice. (B-C) The frequencies of splenic CD4+CCR5+ T cells from naïve and malaria-infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice expressing (B) IL-12Rβ1 and (C) CD25. Data are the mean +/− SEM of the group with 3-5 mice per group and are representative of 2 independent experiments. * P<0.05, WT vs. WSX-1−/− mice.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Anti-IL-12p40 mAb administration to malaria infected WSX-1−/− mice inhibits T-bet expression, reverses CCR5 expression by CD4+ T cells and attenuates CD4+ T cell chemotaxis
WT and WSX-1−/− mice were infected with 104 P. berghei NK65 pRBCs. Some WSX-1−/− mice were treated with 250μg anti-IL-12p40 or anti-IL-2 mAbs every 2nd day starting on day 7 p.i. (A, B) Representative plots (gated on CD4+ T cells) showing the surface expression of (A) T-bet and (B) CCR5 on splenic CD4+ T cells from naïve and infected (day 14 p.i.) WT and WSX-1−/− mice and WSX-1−/− mice treated with anti-IL-12p40 or anti-IL-2. (C, D) The frequencies of splenic CD4+ T cells from naïve, infected control and infected antibody-treated WT and WSX-1−/− mice expressing (C) T-bet or (D) CCR5. (E) The numbers of CD4+ T cells from WT, anti-IL-12p40 mAb treated and control infected WSX-1−/− mice expressing the various T cell subset markers out of 1 ×106 CD4+ T cells utilised in the chemotaxis assay (F) 1×106 purified CD4+ T cells from infected WT, WSX-1−/− and WSX-1−/− mice treated with anti-IL-12p40 or anti-IL-2 were placed in duplicate in the top chamber of a 5μm transwell and migration towards recombinant CCL4 (100ng/ml) in the bottom chamber was assessed by microscopy. Data are the mean +/− SEM of the group with 3-5 mice per group and are representative of 2 independent experiments. * P<0.05, WT vs WSX-1−/− control mice, ~ P<0.05, WT vs anti-IL-12p40 treated WSX-1−/− mice, + P<0.05, WT vs anti-IL-2 treated WSX-1−/− mice, † P<0.05, WSX-1−/− control mice vs. anti-IL-12p40 treated WSX-1−/− mice, ‡ P<0.05, anti-IL-12p40 treated WSX-1−/− mice vs. anti-IL-2 treated WSX-1−/− mice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yoshida H, Nakaya M, Miyazaki Y. Interleukin 27: a double-edged sword for offense and defense. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86:1295–303. - PubMed
    1. Hall AO, Silver JS, Hunter CA. The immunobiology of IL-27. Adv Immunol. 2012;115:1–44. - PubMed
    1. Findlay EG, Greig R, Stumhofer JS, Hafalla JC, de Souza JB, Saris CJ, Hunter CA, Riley EM, Couper KN. Essential role for IL-27 receptor signaling in prevention of Th1-mediated immunopathology during malaria infection. J Immunol. 2010;185:2482–92. - PubMed
    1. Villarino A, Hibbert L, Lieberman L, Wilson E, Mak T, Yoshida H, Kastelein RA, Saris C, Hunter CA. The IL-27R (WSX-1) is required to suppress T cell hyperactivity during infection. Immunity. 2003;19:645–55. - PubMed
    1. Hamano S, Himeno K, Miyazaki Y, Ishii K, Yamanaka A, Takeda A, Zhang M, Hisaeda H, Mak TW, Yoshimura A, Yoshida H. WSX-1 is required for resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi infection by regulation of proinflammatory cytokine production. Immunity. 2003;19:657–67. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms