Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;11(7):714-23.
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0668. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

Oncogenic MUC1-C promotes tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer

Affiliations

Oncogenic MUC1-C promotes tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer

Akriti Kharbanda et al. Mol Cancer Res. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Tamoxifen resistance of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer cells has been linked in part to activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as HER2, and the PI3K-AKT pathway. Mucin 1 (MUC1) is aberrantly overexpressed in about 90% of human breast cancers, and the oncogenic MUC1-C subunit is associated with ERα. The present studies using HER2 overexpressing BT-474 breast cancer cells, which are constitutively resistant to tamoxifen, demonstrate that silencing MUC1-C is associated with (i) downregulation of p-HER2 and (ii) sensitivity to tamoxifen-induced growth inhibition and loss of clonogenic survival. In contrast, overexpression of MUC1-C in tamoxifen-sensitive MCF-7 breast cancer cells resulted in upregulation of p-AKT and tamoxifen resistance. We show that MUC1-C forms complexes with ERα on the estrogen-responsive promoter of Rab31 and that MUC1-C blocks tamoxifen-induced decreases in ERα occupancy. MUC1-C also attenuated tamoxifen-induced decreases in (i) recruitment of the coactivator CREB binding protein, (ii) Rab31 promoter activation, and (iii) Rab31 mRNA and protein levels. The importance of MUC1-C is further supported by the demonstration that targeting MUC1-C with the cell-penetrating peptide inhibitor, GO-203, sensitized tamoxifen-resistant cells to tamoxifen treatment. Moreover, we show that targeting MUC1-C in combination with tamoxifen is highly synergistic in the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Combined, these findings indicate that MUC1-C contributes to tamoxifen resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: D. Kufe is a founder of Genus Oncology and holds equity in the company. The other authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Resistance of HER2-overexpressing BT-474 cells to tamoxifen is conferred by MUC1-C expression
A. Lysates from wild-type (WT) BT-474 cells, BT-474/CshRNA and BT-474/MUC1shRNA cells were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies (left and right). B. Control BT-474/CshRNA (squares) and BT-474/MUC1shRNA (diamonds) cells were left untreated. BT-474/CshRNA (triangles) and BT-474/MUC1shRNA (circles) were also treated with 5 µM tamoxifen on days 0 and 2. Cell number is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates. C. BT-474/CshRNA (solid bars) and BT-474/MUC1shRNA (open bars) cells were treated with 5 µM tamoxifen (left) or 10 nM OHTAM (right) on days 0 and 2. The results (mean±SD of three replicates) are expressed as the percentage of cell death as determined by trypan blue staining on the indicated days (left) or on day 4 (right). D. BT-474/CshRNA and BT-474/MUC1shRNA cells were seeded at 1000 cells/well (6-well plate), grown for 14 days and then stained with crystal violet (left). Colony number (>30 cells) is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates (right). E. BT-474/CshRNA (1000 cells/well; left) and BT-474/MUC1shRNA (2000 cells/well; right) cells were seeded in 6-well plates and left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM tamoxifen (TAM) every other day for 14 days. Colony number (>30 cells) is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overexpression of MUC1-C in MCF-7 cells is associated with tamoxifen resistance
A. Lysates from wild-type (WT) MCF-7 cells, MCF-7/vector and MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. B. Control MCF-7/vector (diamonds) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (triangles) cells were left untreated. MCF-7/vector (circles) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (squares) cells were also treated with 5 µM tamoxifen on days 0, 2 and 4. Cell number is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates. C. MCF-7/vector (open bars) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (solid bars) cells were treated with 5 µM tamoxifen on days 0, 2 and 4 (left) or 10 nM OHTAM on days 0 and 2 (right). The results (mean±SD of three replicates) are expressed as the percentage of cell death as determined by trypan blue staining on the indicated days (left) or on day 4 (right). D. MCF-7/vector and MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were seeded at 500 cells/well (6-well plate), grown for 7 days and then stained with crystal violet (left). Colony number (>30 cells) is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates (right). E. MCF-7/vector (2000 cells/well; left) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (500 cells/well; right) cells were seeded in 6-well plates and left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM tamoxifen (TAM) every other day for 7 days. Colony number (>30 cells) is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates.
Figure 3
Figure 3. MCF-7 cells overexpressing MUC1-C are estrogen-independent
A. MCF-7/vector (squares) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (circles) were seeded at 1 × 104 cells/ml in IMEM/CSS medium for the indicated number of days. The results are expressed as the cell number × 106/ml (mean±SD of three replicates). B. MCF-7/vector (open bars) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (solid bars) cells were seeded in IMEM/CSS medium for the indicated number of days. The results are expressed as the percentage of cell death (mean±SD of three replicates) as determined by trypan blue staining. C. MCF-7/vector and MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were seeded at 500 cells/well (6-well plate), grown for 7 days in IMEM/CSS medium and then stained with crystal violet (left). Colony number (>30 cells) is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates (right).
Figure 4
Figure 4. MUC1-C blocks the effects of tamoxifen on occupancy and activation of the Rab31 promoter
A–C. MCF-7/vector (left) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (right) cells were left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM tamoxifen for 2 days. A. Soluble chromatin was precipitated with anti-ERα or a control IgG. The final DNA samples were analyzed for Rab31 promoter estrogen-responsive element (ERE) or control region (CR) sequences (16). The results (mean+SD of three determinations) are expressed as the relative fold enrichment compared to that obtained with the IgG control. B and C. In re-ChIP experiments, the anti-ERα precipitates were released, reimmunoprecipitated with anti-MUC1-C (B) or anti-CBP (C) and a control IgG, and then analyzed for Rab31 promoter sequences. The results (mean±SD of three determinations) are expressed as the relative fold enrichment compared to that obtained with the IgG control. D. MCF-7/vector and MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were transfected with the pGL3 vector or pRab31-Luc and Renilla plasmid as an internal control. The cells were then left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM tamoxifen for 2 days and then assayed for luciferase activity. The results are expressed as the mean±SD of two experiments each performed with three determinations. E. MCF-7/vector and MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM tamoxifen for 2 days. Rab31 and GAPDH mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR. The results (mean±SD of three determinations) are expressed as relative Rab31 mRNA levels as compared to that obtained for GAPDH. F. MCF-7/vector and MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM tamoxifen for 2 days. Lysates from the indicated cells were immunoblotted with anti-Rab31 and anti-β-actin.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Tamoxifen-resistant cells are sensitive to MUC1-C inhibition
A. BT-474 cells were left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM GO-203 each day for 2 days. Lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. B. BT-474/CshRNA cells were left untreated (diamonds) or treated with 5 µM GO-203 (squares) each day for the indicated days (left). The results (mean±SD of three replicates) are expressed as the viable cell number. BT-474/CshRNA and BT-474/MUC1shRNA cells were seeded at 5 × 104 cells/well and left untreated (right). The BT-474/CshRNA cells were also treated with 5 µM GO-203 each day for 3 days. The results (mean±SD of three replicates) are expressed as the viable cell number on day 4. C. BT-474/CshRNA cells were seeded at 1000 cells/well in 6-well plates and left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM GO-203 each day for 7 days. Colony number (>30 cells) is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates. D. MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM GO-203 each day for 2 days. Lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. E. MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were left untreated (diamonds) or treated with 5 µM GO-203 (squares) each day for the indicated days. The results (mean±SD of three replicates) are expressed as the viable cell number. F. MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were seeded at 200 cells/well in 6-well plates and left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM GO-203 each day for 7 days. Colony number (>30 cells) is expressed as the mean±SD of three replicates. G. MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were left untreated (Control) or treated with 5 µM GO-203 each day for 2 days. Soluble chromatin was precipitated with anti-ERα (left), anti-CBP (right) or a control IgG. The precipitates were analyzed for Rab31 promoter sequences. The results (mean±SD of three determinations) are expressed as the relative fold enrichment compared to that obtained with the IgG control.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Synergistic interaction between GO-203 and tamoxifen
A. MCF-7/MUC1-C cells were infected with lentiviruses expressing the control shRNA (CshRNA) or the MUC1shRNA. Lysates from wild-type (WT) MCF-7 cells, MCF-7/MUC1-C/CshRNA and MCF-7/MUC1-C/MUC1shRNA cells were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. B. MCF-7/MUC1-C/CshRNA (left) and MCF-7/MUC1-C/MUC1shRNA (right) cells were left untreated (triangles) or treated (circles) with 5 µM tamoxifen days 0 and 2. The results (mean±SD of three replicates) are expressed as viable cell number. C and D. BT-474/CshRNA (C) and MCF-7/MUC1-C (D) cells were treated with fixed IC50 ratios of (i) GO-203 alone on days 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, (ii) tamoxifen alone on days 0, 2 and 4 and (iii) the GO-203/tamoxifen combination. For tamoxifen-resistant BT-474/CshRNA and MCF-7/MUC1-C cells, tamoxifen was used at the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations obtained for the tamoxifen-sensitive BT-474/MUC1shRNA and MCF-7/vector cells, respectively. The multiple effect-level isobologram analyses are shown for the ED50 (×), ED75 (+) and ED90 (◉) values.

References

    1. Osborne CK, Schiff R. Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:233–247. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL. Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(9):631–643. - PubMed
    1. Gutierrez MC, Detre S, Johnston S, et al. Molecular changes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: relationship between estrogen receptor, HER-2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(11):2469–2476. - PubMed
    1. De Laurentiis M, Arpino G, Massarelli E, et al. A meta-analysis on the interaction between HER-2 expression and response to endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(13):4741–4748. - PubMed
    1. Ellis MJ, Tao Y, Young O, et al. Estrogen-independent proliferation is present in estrogen-receptor HER2-positive primary breast cancer after neoadjuvant letrozole. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3019–3025. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms