Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013;16(2):67-76.

Use of intravenous tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
  • PMID: 23540893
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Use of intravenous tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

De-Jie Fu et al. Chin J Traumatol. 2013.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: The effect of tranexamic acid (TA) on patients receiving total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported in many small clinical trials. But single trials are not sufficient enough to clarify the effectiveness and safety of TA. So, we carried out a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of the intravenous use of TA in TKA.

Methods: Literatures were retrieved in Cochrane Library, OVID, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Wanfang Data. All the related literatures were checked by two independent investigators and only the high quality randomized controlled trials were enrolled. Relevant data were analyzed using RevMan 5.1 to compare the difference of blood loss, transfusion and complications between TA group and control group.

Results: There were 353 related literatures and only 22 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. The use of TA in TKA significantly reduced total blood loss by a mean of 435.41 ml (95% CI 300.62-570.21, P less than 0.01), post-operative blood loss by a mean of 406.69 ml (95% CI 333.16-480.22, P less than 0.01). TA also significantly lowered the transfusion rate (risk difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.21-0.39, P less than 0.01) and transfusion volume (mean difference 0.95 unit, 95% CI 0.53-1.37, P less than 0.01). The risks between TA group and control group in developing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: TA is beneficial for patients undergoing TKA, which can significantly reduce total blood loss, postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, and transfusion volume. Meanwhile TA is recommended to reduce deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following TKA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms