Attitudes and experience of Dutch general practitioners regarding computerized clinical decision support
- PMID: 23542967
Attitudes and experience of Dutch general practitioners regarding computerized clinical decision support
Abstract
Dutch general practices have a high adoption rate for computerized patient records and clinical decision support. We sought to measure the attitudes and experience of Dutch general practitioners towards clinical decision support.
Methods: A preliminary survey was created based on questions from published surveys, modified with the results of interviews. The final web-based survey was administered to 43 general practitioners in a practice area where a decision support implementation is planned.
Results: Thirty general practitioners (70%) completed the survey. Most felt that decision support is a good idea (23/30), although fewer reported positive experience with decision support (10/30). Participants were supportive of rules and guidelines, but commonly had the sense that there were too many alerts.
Conclusion: Dutch clinicians are positive about decision support, but future efforts should try to reduce the perception of overload, for example by ensuring that alerts are relevant and choosing less interruptive forms of notification for less severe alerts.
Similar articles
-
For which clinical rules do doctors want decision support, and why? A survey of Dutch general practitioners.Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):1076-1090. doi: 10.1177/1460458217740407. Epub 2017 Nov 17. Health Informatics J. 2019. PMID: 29148311 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners' attitudes towards decision-supported prescribing: an analysis of the Dutch primary care sector.Health Informatics J. 2013 Dec;19(4):247-63. doi: 10.1177/1460458212472333. Health Informatics J. 2013. PMID: 24255051
-
A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):652-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00266.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007. PMID: 18042131
-
A survey of factors affecting clinician acceptance of clinical decision support.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Feb 1;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-6. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006. PMID: 16451720 Free PMC article.
-
Critical care nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists interface patterns with computer-based decision support systems.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Nov;19(11):580-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00262.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007. Retraction in: J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Jun;23(6):331. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2011.00642.x. PMID: 17970858 Retracted. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jan 20;16:18. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0196-4. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016. PMID: 26790953 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis.BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):e045050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045050. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34253661 Free PMC article.
-
From assessment to improvement of elderly care in general practice using decision support to increase adherence to ACOVE quality indicators: study protocol for randomized control trial.Trials. 2014 Mar 19;15:81. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-81. Trials. 2014. PMID: 24642339 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
For which clinical rules do doctors want decision support, and why? A survey of Dutch general practitioners.Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):1076-1090. doi: 10.1177/1460458217740407. Epub 2017 Nov 17. Health Informatics J. 2019. PMID: 29148311 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptance and barriers pertaining to a general practice decision support system for multiple clinical conditions: A mixed methods evaluation.PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0193187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193187. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29672521 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources