Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa
- PMID: 23543463
- DOI: 10.1007/s12024-013-9423-9
Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa
Abstract
In previous studies hematocrit has been consistently increased in an anesthetized animal model after exposures to TASER(®) conducted energy weapons (CEWs). In the present study we analyzed changes in blood cell counts and red blood cell membrane proteins following two 30-s applications of a TASER C2 device (which is designed for civilian use). Hematocrit increased significantly from 33.2 ± 2.4 (mean ± SD) to 42.8 ± 4.6 % immediately after CEW exposure of eleven pigs (Sus scrofa). Red blood cell count increased significantly from 6.10 ± 0.55 × 10(12)/L to 7.45 ± 0.94 × 10(12)/L, and mean corpuscular volume increased significantly from 54.5 ± 2.4 fl to 57.8 ± 2.6 fl. Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration decreased significantly from 20.5 ± 0.7 to 18.5 ± 0.6 mM. Thirty protein spots (from two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, selected for detailed comparison) exhibited greater densities 30-min post-exposure compared with pre-exposure values. A greater number of echinocytes were observed following CEW exposure. On the basis of these results it appears that, during the strong muscle contractions produced by TASER CEWs, a specific population of red blood cells (RBCs) may be released from the spleen or other reservoirs within the body. The total time of CEW exposure in the present study was relatively long compared with exposures in common law-enforcement scenarios. Despite statistically significant changes in red blood cell counts (and other measures directly related to RBCs), the alterations were short-lived. The transient nature of the changes would be likely to counteract any potentially detrimental effects.
Similar articles
-
Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013 Sep;9(3):386-94. doi: 10.1007/s12024-013-9436-4. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013. PMID: 23605975 Review.
-
Exposures of Sus scrofa to a TASER(®) conducted electrical weapon: no effects on 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns of plasma proteins.Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Dec;10(4):526-34. doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9606-z. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014. PMID: 25319243
-
Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009;5(3):189-98. doi: 10.1007/s12024-009-9100-1. Epub 2009 Jul 14. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009. PMID: 19598011
-
Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa.J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56 Suppl 1:S229-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01629.x. Epub 2010 Dec 23. J Forensic Sci. 2011. PMID: 21198623
-
TASER® conducted electrical weapons: misconceptions in the scientific/medical and other literature.Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015 Mar;11(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9640-x. Epub 2014 Dec 31. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015. PMID: 25549958 Review.
Cited by
-
Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013 Sep;9(3):386-94. doi: 10.1007/s12024-013-9436-4. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013. PMID: 23605975 Review.
-
Exposures of Sus scrofa to a TASER(®) conducted electrical weapon: no effects on 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns of plasma proteins.Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Dec;10(4):526-34. doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9606-z. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014. PMID: 25319243
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous