Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004983.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004983.pub3.

Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers

Zena E H Moore et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Pressure ulcers (also called pressure sores, bed sores and decubitus ulcers) are areas of tissue damage that occur in the elderly, malnourished or acutely ill, who cannot reposition themselves. Pressure ulcers impose a significant financial burden on health care systems and negatively affect quality of life. Wound cleansing is considered an important component of pressure ulcer care.

Objectives: This systematic review seeks to answer the following question: what is the effect of wound cleansing solutions and wound cleansing techniques on the rate of healing of pressure ulcers?

Search methods: For this third update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 3 January 2013); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12); Ovid MEDLINE (2010 to November Week 3 2012); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations December 31, 2012); Ovid EMBASE (2010 to 2012 Week 52); and EBSCO CINAHL (2010 to 21 December 2012).

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing wound cleansing with no wound cleansing, or different wound cleansing solutions, or different cleansing techniques, were eligible for inclusion if they reported an objective measure of pressure ulcer healing.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors extracted data independently and resolved disagreements through discussion. A structured narrative summary of the included studies was conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, risk ratio (RR), plus 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated; for continuous outcomes, mean difference (MD), plus 95% CI were calculated. Meta analysis was not conducted because of the small number of diverse RCTs identified. Two review authors independently assessed each included study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias.

Main results: One additional eligible study was identified from the updated searches, one study was added to the table of excluded studies. A total of three studies (169 participants) met the inclusion criteria for the review. No studies compared cleansing with no cleansing. Two studies compared different wound cleansing solutions. A statistically significant improvement in Pressure Sore Status Tool scores occurred for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) compared with isotonic saline (P value = 0.025), but no statistically significant change in healing was seen when water was compared with saline (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 41.89). One study compared cleansing techniques; for pressure ulcers cleansed with pulsatile lavage, compared with sham (the lavage flow was directed into a wash basin positioned adjacent to the wound and not visible to the participants), there was a statistically significant reduction in ulcer volume at the end of the three week study period in the lavage group compared with the sham group (MD -6.60, 95% CI-11.23, -1.97).

Authors' conclusions: We identified three small studies addressing cleansing of pressure ulcers. One reported a statistically significant improvement in pressure ulcer healing for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) compared with isotonic saline solution, a further study reported no statistically significant change in healing was seen when wounds were cleaned with water was compared with saline. A final study compared pulsatile lavage with sham and found a significantly greater reduction in ulcer volume at the end of the study period in the lavage group compared with the sham group. The authors conclude that there is no good trial evidence to support use of any particular wound cleansing solution or technique for pressure ulcers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author, Zena Moore, is a member of the medical advisory board of Systagenix Wound Management. The author, Zena Moore, has received an honorarium for speaking at professional meetings for KCI, ConvaTec, Systagenix Wound Management, Fanin Health Care and Smith & Nephew. Seamus Cowman ‐ none known.

Figures

1
1
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Different cleansing techniques, Outcome 1 Pulsatile Lavage versus sham.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Different cleansing solutions, Outcome 1 Saline versus tap water.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Bellingeri 2004 {published data only}
    1. Bellingeri R, Attolini C, Fioretti O, Forma P, Traspedini M, Costa M, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a preparation for the cleansing of cutaneous injuries. Minerva Medica 2004;95(Suppl):1‐9.
Griffiths 2001 {published data only}
    1. Griffiths RD, Fernandez RS, Ussia CA. Is tap water a safe alternative to normal saline for wound irrigation in the community setting?. Journal of Wound Care 2001;10(10):407‐11. - PubMed
Ho 2012 {published data only}
    1. Ho CH, Bensitel T, Wang X, Bogie K M. Pulsatile lavage for the enhancement of pressure ulcer healing: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2012;92(1):38‐48. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Anzai 1989 {published data only}
    1. Anzai T, Shiratori A, Otomo E, Honda S, Yamamoto T, Nishikawa T, et al. Evaluation of Clinical Utility of NI‐009 on Various Cutaneous Ulcers: Comparative Study with Base. Rinsho Iyaku (Journal of Clinical Therapeutics and Medicines) 1989;5(12):2585‐612.
Bellingeri 2003 {published data only}
    1. Bellingeri A, Forma O, Polignano R, Attolini R, Accardi S, Fabbri C, et al. Multi‐centre research on a cleanser for cutaneous wounds. Wound Repair and Regeneration 2003;11(5):A36 P.018.
Boykin 1989 {published data only}
    1. Boykin A, Winland‐Brown J. Pressure sores nursing management. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 1989;15(2232):252‐6. - PubMed
Burke 1998 {published data only}
    1. Burke DT, Ho CH, Saucier MA. Hydrotherapy effects on pressure ulcer healing. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997;78:1053. - PubMed
    1. Burke DT, Ho CHK, Saucier M, Stewart G. Effects of hydrotherapy on pressure ulcer healing. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998;77(5):394‐8. - PubMed
Colombo 1983 {published data only}
    1. Colombo P. Topical chloroxidating solution in wounds treatment: a controlled trial. Acta Toxicologica et Therapeutica 1993;14(2):65‐72.
Della Marchina 1997 {published data only}
    1. Della Marchina M, Renzi G. Cleansing of wounds and cuts in an elderly patient with a new antiseptic preparation. Chronica Dermatologica 1997;7(6):873‐85.
Diekmann 1984 {published data only}
    1. Diekmann J M. Use of a dental irrigating device in the treatment of decubitus ulcers. Nursing Research 1984;33(5):303‐5. - PubMed
Hartman 2002 {published data only}
    1. Hartman D, Coetzee JC. Two US practitioners' experience of using essential oils for wound care. Journal of Wound Care 2002;11(8):317‐20. - PubMed
Hinz 1986 {published data only}
    1. Hinz J, Hautzinger H, Stahl KW. Rationale for and results from a randomised, double blind trial of tetrachlorodecaoxygen anion complex in wound healing. Lancet 1986;1(8458):825‐8. - PubMed
Kucan 1981 {published data only}
    1. Kucan JO, Robson MC, Heggers JP, Ko F. Comparison of silver sulfadiazine, povidone‐iodine and physiologic saline in the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1981;29(5):232‐5. - PubMed
Liu 1999 {published data only}
    1. Liu Y. Clinical effect on yousuo mixed solution to treat decubitus ulcer. Shanxi Nursing Journal 1999;13(4):174‐5.
Saydak 1990 {published data only}
    1. Saydak SJ. A pilot test of two methods for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Journal of Enterostomal Therapy 1990;17(3):140‐2. - PubMed
Toba 1997 {published data only}
    1. Toba K, Sudoh N, Nagano K, Eto N, Mizuno Y, Ouchi Y. Randomised prospective trial of gentian violet with dibutryl cAMP and povidone iodine with sugar as a treatment for pressure sores infected with methicillin resistant staphyloccocus aureus in elderly patients. Japanese Journal of Geriatrics 1997;34(7):577‐82. - PubMed
Van Der Cammen 1987 {published data only}
    1. Cammen TJM, O'Callaghan U, Whitefield M. Prevention of pressure sores, a comparison of new and old pressure sore treatments. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1987;41(11):1009‐11. - PubMed
Wang 1997 {published data only}
    1. Wang Z, Ren J, Song J. Clinical and experimental study on the use of Chuangling solution to treat the ulcer. Shanxi Nursing Journal 1997;11(5):200‐3.

Additional references

Angeras 1992
    1. Angeral MH, Brandberg A, Falk A, Seeman T. Comparison between sterile saline and tap water for the cleansing of acute traumatic wounds. European Journal of Surgery 1992;158(6‐7):347‐50. - PubMed
Bates‐Jensen 1992
    1. Bates‐Jensen BM, Vredevoe DL, Brecht M. Validity and reliability of the pressure sore status tool. Decubitus 1992;5(6):80S‐86S. - PubMed
Beaglehole 1993
    1. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Kjellstrom T. Measuring health and disease. Basic Epidemiology. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1993:13‐20.
Bennett 2004
    1. Bennett G, Dealey C, Posnett J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. Age and Ageing 2004;33(3):230‐5. - PubMed
BNF 2003
    1. BNF. 13.11 Skin Cleansers and Antiseptics. British National Formulary. Oxon: Pharmaceutical Press, 2003:575‐8.
Bridel 1996
    1. Bridel J, Banks S, Mitton C. The admission prevalence and hospital‐acquired incidence of pressure sores within a large teaching hospital during April 1994 to March 1995. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management. London: Macmillan, 1996.
Carr 2006
    1. Carr M. Wound Cleansing: sorely neglected?. Primary Intention: the Australian Journal of Wound Management 2006;14:150‐2, 154, 156‐7.
Carville 1995
    1. Carville K. Wound care manual. Wound care manual. Western Australia, Silver Chain Foundation, 1995.
Day 2000
    1. Day SJ, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. British Medical Journal 2000;321(7259):504. - PMC - PubMed
EPUAP 2002
    1. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Summary report on the prevalence of pressure ulcers. EPUAP Review 2002;4(2):49‐57.
EPUAP/NPUAP 2009
    1. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel & National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Washington DC. 2009.
Fergusson 2002
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Herbert P. Post‐randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 2002;325(7365):652‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Fernandez 2012
    1. Fernandez R, Griffiths R, Ussia C. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003861.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Flanagan 1998a
    1. Flanagan M. Managing wounds. Access to clinical education; wound management. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1998:51‐66.
Fox 2002
    1. Fox C. Living with a pressure ulcer: a descriptive study of patients' experiences. British Journal of Community Nursing Wound Care Supplement 2002;10:12‐4. - PubMed
Gallagher 2008
    1. Gallagher P, Barry P, Hartigan I, McCluskey P, O'Connor K, O'Connor M. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in three university teaching hospitals in Ireland. Journal of Tissue Viability 2008;17:103‐9. - PubMed
Gorecki 2009
    1. Gorecki C, Brown JM, Nelson EA, Briggs M, Schoonhoven L, Dealey C, et al. Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2009;1(57):1175‐83. - PubMed
Greenhalgh 1997
    1. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ 1997;315:305‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Haalboom 2000
    1. Haalboom JRE. Some remarks about overlays in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. EPUAP Review 2000;2(2):67‐70.
Hanson 1993
    1. Hanson D, Langemo D, Olson B. The prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in home care: are patients at risk?. Journal of Home Health Care Practice 1993;5(3):25‐32.
Hellewell 1997
    1. Hellewell TB, Najor DA, Foresman PA, Rodeheaver GT. A cytotoxic evaluation of antimicrobial and non antimicrobial wound cleansers. Wounds 1997;9(1):15‐20.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hollis 1999
    1. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319:670‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Iocono 1998
    1. Iocono JA, Erlich HP, Gottrup F, Leaper DJ. The biology of healing. In: Leaper DJ, Harding KG editor(s). Wounds Biology and Management. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1998:10‐22.
Kaltenthaler 2001
    1. Kaltenthaler E, Whitfield MD, Walters SJ, Akehurst RL, Paisley S. UK, USA and Canada: how do their pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data compare?. Journal of Wound Care 2001;10(1):530‐5. - PubMed
Keelaghan 2008
    1. Keelaghan E, Margolis D, Zhan M, Baumgarten M. Prevalence of pressure ulcers on hospital admission among nursing home residents transferred to the hospital. Wound Repair Regeration 2008;16(3):331‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Kroger 2008
    1. Kröger K, Niebel W, Maier I, Stausberg J, Gerber V, Schwarzkopf A. Prevalence of Pressure Ulcers in Hospitalized Patients in Germany in 2005: Data from the Federal Statistical Office. Gerontology 2008;55(3):281‐7. - PubMed
Lawrence 1997
    1. Lawrence JC. Wound Irrigation. Journal of Wound Care 1997;6(1):23‐6. - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Ligresti 2007
    1. Ligresti C, Bo F. Wound bed preparation of difficult wounds: an evolution of the principles of TIME. International Wound Journal 2007;4(1):21‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Lindholm 1999
    1. Lindohlm C, Bergsten A, Berglund E. Chronic wounds and nursing care. Journal of Wound Care 1999;8(1):5‐10. - PubMed
McInnes 2011
    1. McInnes E, Dumville JC, Jammali‐Blasi A, Bell‐Syer SEM. Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009490] - DOI - PubMed
Moher 2001
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel‐group randomized trials. CONSORT group. Journal of the American Medical Association 2001;285(15):1987‐91. - PubMed
Montori 2001
    1. Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Intention‐to‐treat principle. CMAJ 2001;165(10):1339‐41. - PMC - PubMed
Moore 2000
    1. Moore Z, Pitman S. Towards establishing a pressure sore prevention and management policy in an acute hospital setting. All Ireland Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 2000;1(1):7‐11.
Moore 2011
    1. Moore Z, Cowman S, Conroy RM. A randomised controlled clinical trial of repositioning, using the 30° tilt, for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2011;20(17‐18):2633‐44. - PubMed
Moore 2012
    1. Moore Z, Cowman S. Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention practices in care of the older person in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2012;21(3‐4):362‐71. - PubMed
Morison 1989
    1. Morison MJ. Wound cleansing‐‐which solution?. Professional Nurse 1989;4(5):220‐5. - PubMed
Nixon 1999
    1. Nixon J, Smye S, Scott J, Bond S. The diagnosis of early pressure sores: report of the pilot study. Journal of Tissue Viability 1999;9(2):62‐6. - PubMed
NPUAP 1989
    1. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure ulcer incidence, economics, risk assessment. Consensus development conference statement. Decubitus 1989;2(2):24‐8. - PubMed
O'Meara 2001
    1. O'Meara SM, Cullum NA, Majid M, Sheldon TA. Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds. British Journal of Surgery 2001;88(1):4‐21. - PubMed
Posnett 2009
    1. Posnett J, Gottrup F, Lundgren H, Saal G. The resource impact of wounds on health‐care providers in Europe. Journal of Wound Care 2009;18(4):154‐61. - PubMed
Redelings 2005
    1. Redelings MD, Lee NE, Sorvillo F. Pressure Ulcers: More Lethal Than We Thought?. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2005;18:367‐72. - PubMed
Richardson 1981
    1. Richardson RR, Meyer PR. Prevalence and incidence of pressure sores in acute spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 1981;19(4):235‐47. - PubMed
Robertson 1990
    1. Robertson J, Swain I, Gaywood I. The importance of pressure sores in total health care. Pressure sores, clinical practice and scientific approach. Bader DL. London: Macmillan Press, 1990:3‐13.
Rolstad 2000
    1. Rolstad BS, Ovington LG, Harris A. Principles of wound management. In: Bryant RA editor(s). Acute and chronic wounds nursing management. Second Edition. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: Mosby, 2000:85‐124.
Schoonhoven 2002
    1. Schoonhoven L, Defloor T, Grypdonck HHF. Incidence of pressure ulcers due to surgery. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2002;11(4):479‐87. - PubMed
Schoonhoven 2006
    1. Schoonhoven L, Bousema M, Buskens E. The prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients in The Netherlands: A prospective inception cohort study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2006;44(6):927‐35. - PubMed
Schulz 2000
    1. Schulz KF. Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?. Evidence Based Medicine 2000;5:36‐8. - PubMed
SIGN 2013
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random (accessed February 7 2013).
Singer 1994
    1. Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Subramanian S, Malhotra AK, Villez PA. Pressure dynamics of varying irrigation techniques commonly used in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1994;24(1):36‐40. - PubMed
Stotts 2001
    1. Stotts N. Assessing a patient with a pressure ulcer. In: Morison M editor(s). The prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. London: Mosby, 2001:99‐115.
Thompson 1999
    1. Thompson JS, Brooks RG. The economics of preventing and treating pressure ulcers: a pilot study. Journal of Wound Care 1999;8(6):312‐6. - PubMed
Touche Ross 1993
    1. Touche Ross. The costs of pressure sores. Touche Ross and Company. London, 1993.
Towler 2001
    1. Towler J. Cleansing traumatic wounds with swabs, water or saline. Journal of Wound Care 2001;10(6):231‐4. - PubMed
Versluysen 1986
    1. Versluysen M. How elderly patients with femoral fracture develop pressure sores in hospital. British Medical Journal 1986;292(6531):1311‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Whittington 2000
    1. Whittington K, Patrick M, Roberts J. A national study of pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in acute care hospitals. Journal of Wound Care Nursing 2000;24(4):209‐15. - PubMed
Young 1995
    1. Young T. Common problems in wound care: wound cleansing. British Journal of Nursing 1995;4(5):286‐9. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Moore 2008
    1. Moore Z, Cowman S. A systematic review of wound cleansing for pressure ulcers. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008;17(15):1963‐72. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources