Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 28:(3):CD009418.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009418.pub2.

Subintimal angioplasty for chronic lower limb arterial occlusion

Affiliations

Subintimal angioplasty for chronic lower limb arterial occlusion

Zhi Hui Chang et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Subintimal angioplasty (SIA) has become an established percutaneous procedure for the treatment of symptomatic lower limb arterial occlusions in recent years. However, the clinical benefits of this practice remain unclear. The aim of the review was to determine the effectiveness of SIA on clinical outcomes.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of SIA versus any other treatment for patients with chronic lower limb artery occlusion. This will be determined by the effects on clinical improvement, technical success rate, patency rate, limb salvage rate, and morbidity rates.

Search methods: The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC) searched the Specialised Register (last searched January 2013) and CENTRAL (2012, Issue 12). Clinical trials databases were also searched.

Selection criteria: We planned to include data from randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of SIA and any other management method in the treatment of chronic lower limb arterial occlusion.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors evaluated the trials identified from the searches for appropriateness of inclusion.

Main results: There were no randomized controlled trials in which SIA was compared with any other treatment.

Authors' conclusions: Randomized controlled trial evidence for the effectiveness of SIA is lacking. There is a need for high-quality randomized controlled trials comparing SIA with any other treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources