Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;27(2):242-51.
doi: 10.1037/a0032118.

Attachment insecurity and infidelity in marriage: do studies of dating relationships really inform us about marriage?

Affiliations

Attachment insecurity and infidelity in marriage: do studies of dating relationships really inform us about marriage?

V Michelle Russell et al. J Fam Psychol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Attachment theory provides a useful framework for predicting marital infidelity. However, most research has examined the association between attachment and infidelity in unmarried individuals, and we are aware of no research that has examined the role of partner attachment in predicting infidelity. In contrast to research showing that attachment anxiety is unrelated to infidelity among dating couples, 2 longitudinal studies of 207 newlywed marriages demonstrated that own and partner attachment anxiety interacted to predict marital infidelity, such that spouses were more likely to perpetrate infidelity when either they or their partner was high (vs. low) in attachment anxiety. Further, and also in contrast to research on dating couples, own attachment avoidance was unrelated to infidelity, whereas partner attachment avoidance was negatively associated with infidelity, indicating that spouses were less likely to perpetrate infidelity when their partner was high (vs. low) in attachment avoidance. These effects emerged controlling for marital satisfaction, sexual frequency, and personality; did not differ across husbands and wives; and did not differ across the two studies, with the exception that the negative association between partner attachment avoidance and own infidelity only emerged in 1 of the 2 studies. These findings offer a more complete understanding of the implications of attachment insecurity for marital infidelity and suggest that studies of unmarried individuals may not provide complete insights into the implications of various psychological traits and processes for marriage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interactive Effect of Own Attachment Anxiety and Partner Attachment Anxiety on Likelihood of Infidelity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen ES, Atkins DC, Baucom DH, Snyder DK, Gordon KC, Glass SP. Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2005;12:101–130.
    1. Allen ES, Baucom DH. Adult attachment and patterns of extradyadic involvement. Family Process. 2004;43:467–488. - PubMed
    1. Amato PR, Rogers SJ. A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1997;59:612–624.
    1. Amodio DM, Showers CJ. “Similarity breeds liking” revisited: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2005;22:817–836.
    1. Atkins DC, Baucom DH, Jacobson NS. Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample. Journal of Family Psychology. 2001;15:735–749. - PubMed

Publication types