Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Apr;202(4):253-60.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118018.

Effect of psychosocial interventions on social functioning in depression and schizophrenia: meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of psychosocial interventions on social functioning in depression and schizophrenia: meta-analysis

Mary J De Silva et al. Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial interventions may contribute to reducing the burden of mental disorders in low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries by improving social functioning, but the evidence has not been systematically reviewed.

Aims: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of psychosocial interventions on social functioning in people with depression and schizophrenia in LAMI countries.

Method: Studies were identified through database searching up to March 2011. Randomised controlled trials were included if they compared the intervention group with a control group receiving placebo or treatment as usual. Random effects meta-analyses were performed separately for depressive disorders and schizophrenia and for each intervention type.

Results: Of the studies that met the inclusion criteria (n = 24), 21 had sufficient data to include in the meta-analysis. Eleven depression trials showed good evidence for a moderate positive effect of psychosocial interventions on social functioning (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.69, n = 4009) and ten schizophrenia trials showed a large positive effect on social functioning (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.49-1.19, n = 1671), although seven of these trials were of low quality. Excluding these did not substantially affect the size or direction of effect, although the precision of the estimate was substantially reduced (SMD = 0.89, 95% CI 0.05-1.72, n = 863).

Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions delivered in out-patient and primary care settings are effective at improving social functioning in people with depression and should be incorporated into efforts to scale up services. For schizophrenia there is an absence of evidence from high-quality trials and the generalisabilty of the findings is limited by the over-representation of trials conducted in populations of hospital patients in China. More high-quality trials of psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia delivered in out-patient settings are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Selection of studies.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Depression: all studies (6-month follow-up). Patel et al (2011): a. recruited from public primary healthcare clinics, b. Recruited from private general practice clinics.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schizophrenia: main results (12-month follow-up).

References

    1. World Health Organization The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. WHO, 2004.
    1. Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82: 858–66 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirschfeld RM, Montgomery SA, Keller MB, Kasper S, Schatzberg AF, Moller HJ, et al. Social functioning in depression: a review. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 268–75 - PubMed
    1. Patel V, Thornicroft G. Packages of care for mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries: PLoS medicine series. PloS Med 2009; 6: e1000160 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel V, Simon G, Chowdhary N, Kaaya S, Araya R. Packages of care for depression in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000159 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types