Formation and excretion of pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid. Whole animal and enzyme studies in the rat

Abstract

A corrected method for the measurement of pyrrole-2-carboxylate in rat urine was used in studies of its excretion under various experimental conditions. The findings implicated administered hydroxy-L-proline as a relatively efficient source of urinary pyrrole-2-carboxylate and tended to exclude administered L-proline as a significant direct source. Removal of aerobic gut flora had no influence on the excretion of pyrrole-2-carboxylate either endogenously or following hydroxy-L-proline administration. Related studied showed that rat kidney L-amino acid oxidase catalyzes oxidation of hydroxy-L-proline to delta1-pyrroline-4-hydroxy-2-carboxylate, which is converted to pyrrole-2-carboxylate on acidification of reaction mixtures. All findings were consistent with hydroxy-L-proline as the source of endogenous pyrrole-2-carboxylate excretion. Excretion patterns and labeling patterns were compared after administration of pyrrole-2-carboxylate or of hydroxy-proline epimers. From these data, the true excretion product of hydroxy-L-proline oxidation by L-amino acid oxidase appeared to be the unstable oxidation product, delta1-pyrroline-4-hydroxy-2-carboxylate, which is converted to pyrrole-2-carboxylate in urine. The capacity of homogenates of guinea pig kidney and human kidney to carry out oxidation of hydroxy-L-proline to pyrrole-2-carboxylate was much less than that of rat kidney, consistent with the lower levels of urinary pyrrole-2-carboxylate in these species. Experiments designed to examine the modest increase of pyrrole-2-carboxylate excretion after proline loads led to new observations on tissue levels of hydroxy-L-proline following proline administration and on the inhibition by L-proline of hydroxy-L-proline oxidase.