Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr 1:4:147.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00147. eCollection 2013.

Perceived and actual social discrimination: the case of overweight and social inclusion

Affiliations

Perceived and actual social discrimination: the case of overweight and social inclusion

Freda-Marie Hartung et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The present study examined the correspondence between perceived and actual social discrimination of overweight people. In total, 77 first-year students provided self-ratings about their height, weight, and perceived social inclusion. To capture actual social inclusion, each participant nominated those fellow students (a) she/he likes and dislikes and (b) about whom she/he is likely to hear social news. Students with lower Body Mass Index (BMI) felt socially included, irrespective of their actual social inclusion. In contrast, students with higher BMI felt socially included depending on the degree of their actual social inclusion. Specifically, their felt social inclusion accurately reflected whether they were actually liked/disliked, but only when they were part of social news. When not part of social news, they also showed insensitivity to their actual social inclusion status. Thus, students with a lower BMI tended to be insensitive, while students with a higher BMI showed a differential sensitivity to actual social discrimination.

Keywords: BMI; accuracy; actual discrimination; gossip; overweight; perceived discrimination; social inclusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between perceived social inclusion, Body Mass Index (BMI), social preference, and gossip activity.

References

    1. Andreyeva T., Puhl R. M., Brownell K. D. (2008). Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995–1996 through 2004–2006. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16, 1129–1134 10.1038/oby.2008.35 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carr D., Friedman M. A. (2005). Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. J. Health Soc. Behav. 46, 244–259 10.1177/002214650504600303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cillessen A. H. N., Rose A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 102–105 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x - DOI
    1. Coie J. D., Coppotelli H., Dodge K. A. (1982). Dimensions and types of social-status – a cross-age perspective. Dev. Psychol. 18, 557–570 10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557 - DOI
    1. Crocker J., Cornwell B., Major B. (1993). The stigma of overweight – affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64, 60–70 10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.60 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources