Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(3):e58816.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058816. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

Atrophy rates in asymptomatic amyloidosis: implications for Alzheimer prevention trials

Affiliations

Atrophy rates in asymptomatic amyloidosis: implications for Alzheimer prevention trials

K Abigail Andrews et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

There is considerable interest in designing therapeutic studies of individuals at risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) to prevent the onset of symptoms. Cortical β-amyloid plaques, the first stage of AD pathology, can be detected in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET), and several studies have shown that ~1/3 of healthy elderly have significant β-amyloid deposition. Here we assessed whether asymptomatic amyloid-PET-positive controls have increased rates of brain atrophy, which could be harnessed as an outcome measure for AD prevention trials. We assessed 66 control subjects (age = 73.5±7.3 yrs; MMSE = 29±1.3) from the Australian Imaging Biomarkers & Lifestyle study who had a baseline Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) PET scan and two 3T MRI scans ~18-months apart. We calculated PET standard uptake value ratios (SUVR), and classified individuals as amyloid-positive/negative. Baseline and 18-month MRI scans were registered, and brain, hippocampal, and ventricular volumes and annualized volume changes calculated. Increasing baseline PiB-PET measures of β-amyloid load correlated with hippocampal atrophy rate independent of age (p = 0.014). Twenty-two (1/3) were PiB-positive (SUVR>1.40), the remaining 44 PiB-negative (SUVR≤1.31). Compared to PiB-negatives, PiB-positive individuals were older (76.8±7.5 vs. 71.7±7.5, p<0.05) and more were APOE4 positive (63.6% vs. 19.2%, p<0.01) but there were no differences in baseline brain, ventricle or hippocampal volumes, either with or without correction for total intracranial volume, once age and gender were accounted for. The PiB-positive group had greater total hippocampal loss (0.06±0.08 vs. 0.02±0.05 ml/yr, p = 0.02), independent of age and gender, with non-significantly higher rates of whole brain (7.1±9.4 vs. 4.7±5.5 ml/yr) and ventricular (2.0±3.0 vs. 1.1±1.0 ml/yr) change. Based on the observed effect size, recruiting 384 (95%CI 195-1080) amyloid-positive subjects/arm will provide 80% power to detect 25% absolute slowing of hippocampal atrophy rate in an 18-month treatment trial. We conclude that hippocampal atrophy may be a feasible outcome measure for secondary prevention studies in asymptomatic amyloidosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: KA is funded by an EPSRC (www.epsrc.ac.uk) industrial CASE PhD studentship http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/skills/students/coll/icase/Pages/intro.aspx) co-sponsored by commercial partner IXICO Ltd (www.ixico.com). The DRC holds a patent for QA Box (automated quality assurance for scan acquisition parameters), which may accrue revenue in the future, and currently receives royalties from Midas image processing software licences. NF has provided consultancy to GE Healthcare, Janssen-Cilag, Janssen-Elan pharmaceuticals, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals Inc, Lilly Research Labs, Eisai Inc and Johnson & Johnson; CR holds grants from CSIRO, Bayer, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, GE Healthcare and Astra Zeneca; VV has provided consultancy to Bayer Healthcare and holds a grant from NHMRC/ADDF; JS receives grant funding from AVID Radiopharmaceuticals Inc and receives royalties from Henry Stewart talks. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Plots of baseline SUVR vs. annualized hippocampal change.
(A) The relationships and regression slope for the group as a whole; (B) APOE4 individuals shown in closed circles; (C) subjective cognitive impairment individuals shown in closed circles. SUVR values between 1.31 and 1.40 separate the groups: a reference line at SUVR = 1.35 is shown for illustration.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reiman EM, Langbaum JBS, Fleisher AS, Caselli RJ, Chen K, et al. (2011) Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative: a plan to accelerate the evaluation of presymptomatic treatments. J Alzheimers Dis 26 Suppl 3321–329 doi:10.3233/JAD-2011-0059. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herholz K, Ebmeier K (2011) Clinical amyloid imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 10: 667–670 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70123-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist G, et al. (2004) Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol 55: 306–319 doi:10.1002/ana.20009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Hansson O, Andreasen N, Parnetti L, et al. (2009) CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. JAMA 302: 385–393 doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1064. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fox NC, Schott JM (2004) Imaging cerebral atrophy: normal ageing to Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 363: 392–394 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15441-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances