Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;9(3):e1002974.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002974. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

Bursts of vertex activation and epidemics in evolving networks

Affiliations

Bursts of vertex activation and epidemics in evolving networks

Luis E C Rocha et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013.

Abstract

The dynamic nature of contact patterns creates diverse temporal structures. In particular, empirical studies have shown that contact patterns follow heterogeneous inter-event time intervals, meaning that periods of high activity are followed by long periods of inactivity. To investigate the impact of these heterogeneities in the spread of infection from a theoretical perspective, we propose a stochastic model to generate temporal networks where vertices make instantaneous contacts following heterogeneous inter-event intervals, and may leave and enter the system. We study how these properties affect the prevalence of an infection and estimate R(0), the number of secondary infections of an infectious individual in a completely susceptible population, by modeling simulated infections (SI and SIR) that co-evolve with the network structure. We find that heterogeneous contact patterns cause earlier and larger epidemics in the SIR model in comparison to homogeneous scenarios for a vast range of parameter values, while smaller epidemics may happen in some combinations of parameters. In the case of SI and heterogeneous patterns, the epidemics develop faster in the earlier stages followed by a slowdown in the asymptotic limit. For increasing vertex turnover rates, heterogeneous patterns generally cause higher prevalence in comparison to homogeneous scenarios with the same average inter-event interval. We find that [Formula: see text] is generally higher for heterogeneous patterns, except for sufficiently large infection duration and transmission probability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Prevalence of the infection in SI epidemics.
The prevalence formula image in case of SI epidemics for HET and HOM contact patterns with formula image (blue curves) and formula image (red curves). Each column corresponds to a different formula image, (A) formula image, (B) formula image and (C) formula image. The x-axis is in log-scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Prevalence of the infection in SIR epidemics.
Curves correspond to the fraction of infected formula image (i.e. the prevalence – blue) and fraction of susceptible individuals formula image (red). Each panel contains a different configuration: (A)formula image and formula image; (B) formula image and formula image; (C) formula image and formula image; (D) formula image and formula image; (E) formula image and formula image; (F) formula image and formula image. The x-axis is in log-scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Intensity of the peak prevalence for SIR epidemics.
Difference in the intensity of peak prevalence formula image for (A) deterministic (formula image) and for (B) stochastic (formula image) SIR dynamics with various infective intervals in case of formula image. F statistics for (C) deterministic (formula image) and for (D) stochastic (formula image) SIR (red and white mean that HET and HOM peak intensities are statistically different, that is, formula image), raw p-values are in Text S1; the difference relative to the HET case, that is, formula image for (E) deterministic (formula image) and for (F) stochastic (formula image) SIR.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Time of the peak prevalence for SIR epidemics.
Difference in the time of peak prevalence formula image for (A) deterministic (formula image) and for (B) stochastic (formula image) SIR dynamics with various infective intervals in case of formula image; F statistics for (C) deterministic (formula image) and for (D) stochastic (formula image) SIR (red and white mean that HET and HOM peak times are statistically different, i.e. formula image), raw p-values are in Text S1; the difference relative to the HET case, that is, formula image for (E) deterministic (formula image) and for (F) stochastic (formula image) SIR.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Estimation of for deterministic SIR epidemics.
Numerical estimation of formula image for SIR in case of (A) formula image and (C) formula image (with formula image), and in case of (B) formula image and (D) formula image (with formula image). The results are independent of the network size formula image (see Text S1). Dashed lines correspond to formula image. The F statistics is presented above the plots. Dashed lines correspond to formula image; formula image and formula image are statistically different if formula image.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Estimation of for stochastic SIR epidemics.
Numerical estimation of formula image for HET network (formula image) and the difference of formula image between HET and HOM networks, that is, formula image. formula image for HET in case of (A) formula image and (E) formula image; formula image for (B) formula image and (F) formula image; F statistics for (C) formula image and (G) formula image (red and white mean that HET and HOM cases are statistically different, that is, formula image); p-values for (D) formula image and (H) formula image.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Distribution of outbreak sizes by random initial infection seeds.
Fraction of times formula image an epidemic outbreak with size formula image is observed at time formula image. The results correspond to the SIR model with formula image and network configurations with formula image.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Newman M (2010) Networks: An introduction. USA: Oxford University Press. 720p.
    1. Costa LdaF, Oliveira ON Jr, Travieso G, Rodrigues FA, Villas Boas PR, et al. (2011) Analyzing and modeling real-world phenomena with complex networks: A survey of applications. Adv Phys 60 (3) 329–412.
    1. Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys Rev Lett 86 (14) 3200–3203. - PubMed
    1. Newman M (2002) Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E 66: 016128. - PubMed
    1. Ueno T, Masuda N (2008) Controlling nosocomial infection based on structure of hospital social networks. J Theor Biol 254 (3) 655–666. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources